mbse:metricreferences
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
mbse:metricreferences [2015/12/03 16:21] jcwatson |
mbse:metricreferences [2016/05/05 13:23] (current) jcwatson |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| | **[[http://www.ndia.org/Divisions/Divisions/SystemsEngineering/Documents/Committees/M_S%20Committee/2011/February/NDIA-SE-MS_2011-02-15_Bergenthal.pdf|Final Report- Model Based Engineering (MBE) Subcommittee]]** | Presentation |Bergenthal, Jeff. Final Report- Model Based Engineering (MBE) Subcommittee. NDIA Systems Engineering Division M&S Committee. February 2011.|The presentation provides the final report of the NDIA Model Based Engineering Subcommittee. It provides potential MBE benefits, costs and risks, the current and to-be MBE state and some recommendations for going forward. In addition it provides a large collection of MBE related papers, see slides 33 through 37. On chart 11 it references some of those papers to the acquisition life cycle.| | | **[[http://www.ndia.org/Divisions/Divisions/SystemsEngineering/Documents/Committees/M_S%20Committee/2011/February/NDIA-SE-MS_2011-02-15_Bergenthal.pdf|Final Report- Model Based Engineering (MBE) Subcommittee]]** | Presentation |Bergenthal, Jeff. Final Report- Model Based Engineering (MBE) Subcommittee. NDIA Systems Engineering Division M&S Committee. February 2011.|The presentation provides the final report of the NDIA Model Based Engineering Subcommittee. It provides potential MBE benefits, costs and risks, the current and to-be MBE state and some recommendations for going forward. In addition it provides a large collection of MBE related papers, see slides 33 through 37. On chart 11 it references some of those papers to the acquisition life cycle.| | ||
| | **{{:mbse:avsis_savi_program_proof_of_concept_demonstrations_don_ward_incose_mbse_workshop.pdf|AVSI’s SAVI Program: Proof of Concept Demonstrations}}** | Presentation |Ward, Don. AVSI’s System Architecture Virtual Integration Program: Proof of Concept Demonstrations. INCOSE IW 2013 MBSE Workshop. January 2013.|This presentation provides a summary description of the AVSI’s (Aerospace Vehicle Systems Institute) Systems Architecture Virtual Integration (SAVI) Proof of Concept project, it provides actual measured return on investment results of the project and it provides the next set of planned steps for the project.| | | **{{:mbse:avsis_savi_program_proof_of_concept_demonstrations_don_ward_incose_mbse_workshop.pdf|AVSI’s SAVI Program: Proof of Concept Demonstrations}}** | Presentation |Ward, Don. AVSI’s System Architecture Virtual Integration Program: Proof of Concept Demonstrations. INCOSE IW 2013 MBSE Workshop. January 2013.|This presentation provides a summary description of the AVSI’s (Aerospace Vehicle Systems Institute) Systems Architecture Virtual Integration (SAVI) Proof of Concept project, it provides actual measured return on investment results of the project and it provides the next set of planned steps for the project.| | ||
| + | | **{{:mbse:how_product_development_organizations_can_achieve_long-term_savings_1_.pdf|How Product Development Organizations can Achieve Long-Term Cost Savings Using Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)}}** | Paper Reference |Krasner, Jerry. How Product Development Organizations can Achieve Long-Term Cost Savings Using Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE). October 2015.|A report by Embedded Market Forecasters (EMF), the market research division of American Technology International, Inc., reports measured improvements as a result of MBSE. Their data set is based on 6 years of survey data totaling more than 4000 developer responses, and claims 95% +/- 3% statistical accuracy of conclusions from their 2015 data set. In summary, (1) MBSE delivers a 55% reduction in total development cost; (2) MBSE enables product-line engineering, which delivers a 42% reduction in cost compared to typical SE; (3) MBSE reduces design delays and cancellations, improves the relationship between pre-design expectations and final designs, enables faster completion of products, enables easy upgrades to meet new market opportunities, results in minimal redesign necessitated by changes in available hardware, minimizes the possibility of product recalls, and makes in-field support more cost effective because support personnel can more clearly understand design models and code. | | ||
| | **[[http://agileelements.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/cost-of-software-defects/|Cost of Software Defects]]** | Web Reference | Strickler,Jon. Cost of Software Defects. Agile Elements. April 22, 2008.| This web site provides metrics associated with defects found in different phases of the development cycle. | | | **[[http://agileelements.wordpress.com/2008/04/22/cost-of-software-defects/|Cost of Software Defects]]** | Web Reference | Strickler,Jon. Cost of Software Defects. Agile Elements. April 22, 2008.| This web site provides metrics associated with defects found in different phases of the development cycle. | | ||
| | **[[http://journal.thedacs.com/issue/52/146|Toward Model-Based Embedded System Validation through Virtual Integration]]** | Web Reference | Feiler, P. H. & Hansson, J. Toward Model-Based Embedded System Validation through Virtual Integration. SoftwareTech. Vol. 12, No.4. 2010.| This paper describes the use of a model-based approach to reduce defects and identify defects earlier. | | | **[[http://journal.thedacs.com/issue/52/146|Toward Model-Based Embedded System Validation through Virtual Integration]]** | Web Reference | Feiler, P. H. & Hansson, J. Toward Model-Based Embedded System Validation through Virtual Integration. SoftwareTech. Vol. 12, No.4. 2010.| This paper describes the use of a model-based approach to reduce defects and identify defects earlier. | | ||
mbse/metricreferences.txt · Last modified: 2016/05/05 13:23 by jcwatson
Page Tools
