This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
mbse:sysml_stk_iw2011 [2011/01/25 23:48] bjorncole |
mbse:sysml_stk_iw2011 [2011/01/31 14:26] (current) bjorncole |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | Agenda for Joint Challenge Team session: | + | The afternoon session aims to focus on specific STK / SysML integration issues. For example: |
- | //<This agenda is in draft form>// | + | * **A truly standard way to define a reference frame within SysML** |
+ | * **Time** | ||
+ | * **Tracing system model version to feed analysis version back to populate system model** | ||
+ | * Any markup on typical models that is missing that appears to be required to populate STK | ||
+ | * **What about time? Do we need it to truly interface Scenarios to STK? What might we need?** | ||
+ | * **Advertising STK's analysis service to SysML with available handles to connect with** | ||
+ | * Importing STK Scenarios and trajectories into the SysML model | ||
- | * Limitations on submitted SysML models for transfer to STK (25 minutes) - what's the strategy? | + | We may knock down one, maybe two of the above STK / SysML issues in the hour, so we will have to choose. |
- | * Primitives available from STK (reference frames, Earth precession effects on sky views, etc.) (10 minutes) | + | |
- | * Reporting on results (15 minutes) via Document Generation | + | |
Discussion minutes: | Discussion minutes: |