User Tools

Site Tools


mbse:telescope_mbse_sig_meetings_edingburgh_june_2016

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
mbse:telescope_mbse_sig_meetings_edingburgh_june_2016 [2016/07/10 23:17]
rkarban
mbse:telescope_mbse_sig_meetings_edingburgh_june_2016 [2016/07/11 00:37]
rkarban
Line 5: Line 5:
   * Andrius Armonas andrius.armonas@nomagic.com   * Andrius Armonas andrius.armonas@nomagic.com
   * Gerard le Roux gerhard@ska.ac.za   * Gerard le Roux gerhard@ska.ac.za
-  * Wim Pessemier wim.pessemier@ku.leuven.be (Mercator telescope)+  * Wim Pessemier wim.pessemier@kuleuven.be (Mercator telescope)
   * Francisco Delgado delgado@lsst.org   * Francisco Delgado delgado@lsst.org
   * Brian Selvy bselvy@lsst.org   * Brian Selvy bselvy@lsst.org
Line 48: Line 48:
   * Robert K    * Robert K 
     (JPL 50% MBSE environment,​ SE lead JPL mission Eng environment;​ 50% projects side, Europa project, TMT APS; NASA SYSML RTF, SYSML 2.0; IMCE MBEE - Ontology driven); ​   SysML includes specification of Systems Modeling Environment;​ OMG WG on reliability analysis; Model validation client vs server side     (JPL 50% MBSE environment,​ SE lead JPL mission Eng environment;​ 50% projects side, Europa project, TMT APS; NASA SYSML RTF, SYSML 2.0; IMCE MBEE - Ontology driven); ​   SysML includes specification of Systems Modeling Environment;​ OMG WG on reliability analysis; Model validation client vs server side
-  * Michele Z. (ESO, REQ for software development,​ modeling infrastructure,​ Interesting in MBSE activities on optical and radio telescope, description models with specific models tools (MATLAB..etc),​ FMEA ); Model based document generation (plugin to MD). Difficult to make them "​perfect"​ with available resources. User want them "​perfect"​ to be accepted;​Fault Analysis +  * Michele Z. (ESO, REQ for software development,​ modeling infrastructure,​ Interesting in MBSE activities on optical and radio telescope, description models with specific models tools (MATLAB..etc),​ FMEA ); Model based document generation (plugin to MD). Difficult to make them "​perfect"​ with available resources. User want them "​perfect"​ to be accepted;​Fault Analysis; activity in MBSE in other organizations?​ how to convince management? examples? integrate SysML with domain specific tools? how? validate models? FTA, FMECA? 
-  * Brian W. (Gemini, MBSE from GMTO working with Josema) +  * Brian W. (Gemini, MBSE from GMTO working with Josema); what do others do? 
-  * Andrius A. (No magic, PM new product like collaborator,​ Database of product models, Reliability and Safety Analysis) +  * Andrius A. (No magic, PM new product like collaborator,​ Database of product models, Reliability and Safety Analysis); Magic Draw product manager; create database of open source models; ​ 
-  * Gerhard Le Roux (SKA, communication between multiple partners, communication with stakeholder and produce information available) +  * Gerhard Le Roux (SKA, communication between multiple partners, communication with stakeholder and produce information available); globally distributed SE team, single source of truth, sync across teams, validate models live of offline? 
-  * Wim Pessemier (Industrial engineer, Mercator Telescope, Use SYSML, UML, enterprise architect, ONTOLOGY, SPARQL—>​ Web base documentation,​ Poster tomorrow, happy to share ONTOLOGY) +  * Wim Pessemier (Industrial engineer, Mercator Telescope ​1.2m, Use SYSML, UML, enterprise architect, ONTOLOGY, SPARQL—>​ Web base documentation,​ Poster tomorrow, happy to share ONTOLOGY)
-  * Rebecca Bernstein (Project Scientist, Requirements) +    OWL, RDF, textual DSL, triple store, generate web based documentation,​ tools used by others? 
-  * Richard Prestage (NRAO, Project Scientist 30 years in radio, Uses cases and ICD, formalism to prevent out of date) +  * Rebecca Bernstein (Project Scientist ​GMT, Requirements) 
-  * Corry T. (SKA using several Standards in FMECA and Maintenance Plan, SQDatabase, for reliability and availability,​ Simulation of the entire scenario, ​RANDLOCK  +  * Richard Prestage (NRAO, Project Scientist 30 years in radio, Uses cases and ICD, formalism to prevent out of date); improve workflow, how to infuse MBSE 
-  * Francisco Delgado (LSST, TCS and OCS in Sysml, Scheduler and Observatory) +  * Corry T. (SKA using several Standards in FMECA and Maintenance Plan, SQDatabase, for reliability and availability,​ Simulation of the entire scenario, ​RAMLOCK); simulation language, discrete event simulation, feddback system into database of components in production. MBSE -> roll-up of parameters to be aggregated and managed over life time, configuration managnent 
-  * Jose L. A. (ESA, PSE for UCLIDE, SE standardization and definition, ESA ontology, mission level up to contractors with industries, lesson and learns) +  * Francisco Delgado (LSST, TCS and OCS in Sysml, Scheduler and Observatory); feasibility of science, validation of telescope design, model of observatory control system, gap analysis, find orphaned requirements/​components,​ requirements management -> Doors? Sync, single tool? 
-  * Mike M. (UK ATC, SYSML using for a couple of years, new project , used so far SKA) +  * Jose L. A. (ESA, PSE for UCLIDE, SE standardization and definition, ESA ontology, mission level up to contractors with industries, lesson and learns); representative of science division, EUCLID 25 models across consortium, 3-4 at ESA, basic infrastructure,​ handbook, management of requirements,​ VnV, works all very well, many individual contractors,​ specify deliverables,​ how to exchange information -> ECSS-E-TM-IO-252/​256 standard 
-  * Brian S. (REQ and ICDs, document, Part of OMGs group) +  * Mike M. (UK ATC, SYSML using for a couple of years, new project , used so far SKA); ATC tools set up, 5 people, define best way to use tools, setup of framework, infrastructure for all projects 
-  * Daniel Hayden(SKA, CAMeo and several different tools )+  * Brian S. (REQ and ICDs, document, Part of OMGs group); OMG rep for AURA, verification plan, extended SysML for verification,​ integration of domain tools 
 +  * Daniel Hayden(SKA, CAMeo and several different tools ); Cameo, Core, Interslate, system model for low/mid telescope, interchange via documents on confluence
   * Josema F. (GMTO, System architecture,​ Software lead —> MBSE mission, System and Subsystem, Trades—> ​   * Josema F. (GMTO, System architecture,​ Software lead —> MBSE mission, System and Subsystem, Trades—> ​
   * Solange R. (IPAC/​Caltech,​ Archival data, Space missions, Deputy task lead)   * Solange R. (IPAC/​Caltech,​ Archival data, Space missions, Deputy task lead)
Line 78: Line 79:
  
 ==== Discussion around following topics ==== ==== Discussion around following topics ====
-  * Which tools is being used: Majority for MD, LSST using EA.+  * Which tools is being used: Majority for MD, LSST, Mercator ​using EA.
   * OSLC vs FMI/FMU   * OSLC vs FMI/FMU
   * OSLC vs ESA's ECSS-E-TM-10-25C for tool interoperability (Jose Lorenzo);​(LCSS-E-TM-10-25C space mission in europe—>​ define how to exchange models —XML profile, STEP file)   * OSLC vs ESA's ECSS-E-TM-10-25C for tool interoperability (Jose Lorenzo);​(LCSS-E-TM-10-25C space mission in europe—>​ define how to exchange models —XML profile, STEP file)
mbse/telescope_mbse_sig_meetings_edingburgh_june_2016.txt · Last modified: 2016/07/11 00:37 by rkarban