User Tools

Site Tools


start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
start [2023/01/16 19:16]
admin [Interested Organizations]
start [2024/04/03 13:40] (current)
admin [Meetings] Added missing 2023 and 2024Q1 meeting rows
Line 32: Line 32:
  
 ===== Co-Chairs ===== ===== Co-Chairs =====
-  ​* Bobbin Teegarden (OntoAge) +  * Claude Baudoin (cébé IT & Knowledge Management
-  ​* Claude Baudoin (cébé IT & Knowledge Management+  * (vacant) 
 + 
 +Bobbin Teegarden (OntoAge) is co-chair emerita (2019-2023) and her contributions are appreciated. 
 + 
 +**//The AI PTF needs a new co-chair. Expressions of interest are encouraged at the address below. A list of typical tasks of a co-chair will be provided upon request.//​**
  
 The co-chairs are collectively reachable at the address [[[email protected]]]. ​     ​ The co-chairs are collectively reachable at the address [[[email protected]]]. ​     ​
Line 52: Line 56:
     * Identification of relevant tools, interfaces a.nd standards in product development and production, to ensure data provision for AI applications.     * Identification of relevant tools, interfaces a.nd standards in product development and production, to ensure data provision for AI applications.
   * **[[https://​www.firepoint.info/​|Firepoint]],​** an R&D consulting organization with a two-year contract to help the U.S. Army's [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​United_States_Army_Aviation_and_Missile_Center|Aviation and Missile Center]] (AvMC) examine the landscape of AI capabilities that could be leveraged (contacts: Logan Schraeder and Timothy Johnson).   * **[[https://​www.firepoint.info/​|Firepoint]],​** an R&D consulting organization with a two-year contract to help the U.S. Army's [[https://​en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​United_States_Army_Aviation_and_Missile_Center|Aviation and Missile Center]] (AvMC) examine the landscape of AI capabilities that could be leveraged (contacts: Logan Schraeder and Timothy Johnson).
-  * **[[https://​www.lmco.com|Lockheed Martin]]. Ademola Adejokun has participated in some meetings and intends to collaborate on the AI taxonomy effort. +  * **[[https://​www.lmco.com|Lockheed Martin]].** Ademola Adejokun has participated in some meetings and intends to collaborate on the AI taxonomy effort. 
-  * **[[https://​www.nist.gov|NIST]]. As of January 2023, NIST is engaged in exploratory discussions with OMG's AI PTF because ov th overlap with an ontology effort related to the Industrial Ontology Foundry (IOF).+  * **[[https://​www.nist.gov|NIST]].** As of January 2023, NIST is engaged in exploratory discussions with OMG's AI PTF because ov th overlap with an ontology effort related to the Industrial Ontology Foundry (IOF).
  
 ---- ----
Line 69: Line 73:
 An "AI metamodel"​ (this term has been critiqued, since it seems to be more of a taxonomy than a metamodel) of the range of technologies that are "in scope" for the AI PTF was proposed during the Agent PSIG meeting in June 2019 and is shown below (click on the figure to enlarge it). The left hand side of the diagram is more about knowledge representations,​ the right-hand side about AI capabilities or applications based on those representations. An "AI metamodel"​ (this term has been critiqued, since it seems to be more of a taxonomy than a metamodel) of the range of technologies that are "in scope" for the AI PTF was proposed during the Agent PSIG meeting in June 2019 and is shown below (click on the figure to enlarge it). The left hand side of the diagram is more about knowledge representations,​ the right-hand side about AI capabilities or applications based on those representations.
  
-{{:​agent2019-06-01_ai_metamodel.gif}}+{{:​agent2019-06-01_ai_metamodel.gif?direct|}} 
 + 
 +This model was further refined during interim conference calls, noting that it mixes concepts of information representation,​ "​mechanisms"​ of AI, and applications of AI. This has led to the three-tier architecture shown below.
  
 +{{:​ai_ptf_reference_model_2022-02-21.png?​direct|}}
 ---- ----
  
Line 93: Line 100:
 | Jun 2021 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​21-09-01.pdf|June 2021 meeting notes]] | | | Jun 2021 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​21-09-01.pdf|June 2021 meeting notes]] | |
 | 29 Sep 2021 | [[https://​docs.google.com/​document/​d/​19vqFNuLRDbC8AGfnPAIFfIZ5iAMInbumKMDn4OhhN00/​edit?​usp=sharing|Sep. 2021 meeting notes]] | Draft only | | 29 Sep 2021 | [[https://​docs.google.com/​document/​d/​19vqFNuLRDbC8AGfnPAIFfIZ5iAMInbumKMDn4OhhN00/​edit?​usp=sharing|Sep. 2021 meeting notes]] | Draft only |
-| 8 Dec 2021 | [[https://​www.omgwiki.org/agendas/2021Q4/ArtificialIntelligencePTFCalendar.html|Agenda]] | | +| 8 Dec 2021 | [[https://​www.omg.org/members/cgi-bin/doc?​ai/​22-01-01.pdf|Dec 2021 meeting notes]] | | 
-| 22 Mar 2022 | [[https://​www.omgwiki.org/agendas/2022Q1/ArtificialIntelligencePTFCalendar.html|Agenda]] | |+| 22 Mar 2022 | [[https://​www.omg.org/members/cgi-bin/doc?​ai/​22-04-01.pdf|March 2022 meeting notes]] | |
 | 21 Jun 2022 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​22-07-01.pdf|June 2022 meeting notes]] | | | 21 Jun 2022 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​22-07-01.pdf|June 2022 meeting notes]] | |
-| 23 Aug 2022 | [[Interim AI Taxonomy meeting notes]] | Pending participant review ​+| 23 Aug 2022 | [[Interim AI Taxonomy meeting notes]] | | 
-| 20 Sep 2022 | [[https://​www.omgwiki.org/agendas/2022Q3/ArtificialIntelligencePTFCalendar.html|Agenda]] | (notes expected in Oct.) +| 20 Sep 2022 | [[https://​www.omg.org/members/cgi-bin/doc?​ai/​22-11-01.pdf|Sep 2022 meeting notes]] | | 
-| 6 Dec 2022 | Planned date for the next meeting | |+| 6 Dec 2022 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​22-12-03.pdf|Dec 2022 meeting ​notes]] | | 
 +| 16 Jan 2023 | [[q1_2023_ai_ptf_teleconference_notes]] | | 
 +| 21 Mar 2023 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​23-03-03.pdf|March 2023 Meeting Notes]] | | 
 +| 20 Jun 2023 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​23-09-01.pdf |June 2023 Meeting Notes]] | | 
 +| 26 Sep 2023 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​23-10-01.pdf |Sep 2023 Meeting Notes]] | | 
 +| 5 Dec 2023 | [[https://​www.omg.org/​members/​cgi-bin/​doc?​ai/​23-12-04.pdf |Dec 2023 Meeting Notes]] | | 
 +| 19 Mar 2024 | to be published ​|
  
 Future meeting agenda ideas: Future meeting agenda ideas:
   * A full-day "​forum"​ including representatives from NIST, and other organizations that responded to the NIST RFI on AI Standards. A "call for papers"​ was issued in mid-January 2020 to solicit additional presentations.   * A full-day "​forum"​ including representatives from NIST, and other organizations that responded to the NIST RFI on AI Standards. A "call for papers"​ was issued in mid-January 2020 to solicit additional presentations.
 +  * Write and issue an RFP on a UML model of neural networks (suggested by Xephor Solutions)
 +  * Issue an RFI to "​replace"​ the 2019 NIST RFI
 +  * Transform the AI vocavulary/​taxonomy into an ontology or knowledge graph
  
   * [[AI PTF Potential Speakers]]   * [[AI PTF Potential Speakers]]
start.1673914578.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/01/16 19:16 by admin