The goal of DMN is to standardise notations (and associated metamodel for) decision modelling. This is a business modelling challenge that touches on:
entities like decision tables
decisions in process models
business vocabularies and policy-type business rules (guidance and constraints)
“Business Rule Management Systems” providing decision table model and automation capabilities
methodologies such as KPI Decision Model (TM) and Business Rule Solutions Q-Charts (TM), and their associated notations for decision models
“Decision Model and Notation” follows the BPMN2 abbreviation (Business Process Model and Notation).
Provide a standard framework for decision model types
Provide a standard notation for decision tables (etc) (and associated semantics)
Provide standardised notations for decisions in business process models (ie BPMN)
Provide a standard technology-agnostic notation for decision models
Provide interchangable decision models or tables between tools
Encourage better control of decisions in models and applications
A CIM and PIM layer metamodel to support both business and IT users (cf BPMN)
Use of SBVR for CIM-level decision tables that can also support SBVR modelling
Mapping to PRR for PIM-level decision tables that can map to BREs as an execution technology (PSM)
A means of moving from SBVR CIM to PRR PIM for execution of (relevant) business rules (in some task context)
Decision Model, Type and Notation requires a classification scheme that includes Decision Tables
DMN will be standalone but refer / link where required / desired to other standards eg BMM, SBVR, BPMN, PRR, PMML
Decision models themselves can be goal models, analytic models, orchestrations (ruleflows), etc…
DMN, like BPMN, will probably have a joint analyst and IT audience
No “decision process/workflow” or methodology is provided for in DMN although the RFP states support for iterative development is required