User Tools

Site Tools


notes_from_nicolas_rouquette_of_8_aug_2010

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
notes_from_nicolas_rouquette_of_8_aug_2010 [2010/08/12 15:50]
admin
notes_from_nicolas_rouquette_of_8_aug_2010 [2010/08/12 15:50] (current)
admin
Line 8: Line 8:
 e. Resulting changes in SMSC processes for acceptance of documents and publishing of documents. e. Resulting changes in SMSC processes for acceptance of documents and publishing of documents.
  
-//I would add the following://+I would add the following:
  
 f. guidelines for using configuration management techniques at the level of machine-readable files & specification documents resulting in accurate traceability of all changes made f. guidelines for using configuration management techniques at the level of machine-readable files & specification documents resulting in accurate traceability of all changes made
Line 18: Line 18:
 Our current practices and processes depend on email, the lowest common denominator we have. There is clearly better technology for issue management than email. Until the OMG commits to adopting a better technology for issue management, we will have an OMG cottage industry of ad-hoc processes. -- BMI, BPMN, UPDM, SysML, UML, ODM, OCL, ...  Our current practices and processes depend on email, the lowest common denominator we have. There is clearly better technology for issue management than email. Until the OMG commits to adopting a better technology for issue management, we will have an OMG cottage industry of ad-hoc processes. -- BMI, BPMN, UPDM, SysML, UML, ODM, OCL, ... 
  
-// Additional topics for the ToR://+Additional topics for the ToR:
  
 g. issue acceptance/​editing g. issue acceptance/​editing
notes_from_nicolas_rouquette_of_8_aug_2010.txt ยท Last modified: 2010/08/12 15:50 by admin