This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
|
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:90_recomend:start [2022/05/18 00:49] nick |
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:90_recomend:start [2022/06/17 19:44] (current) terrance |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| | [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:start| Return to Recommendations ]] | <WRAP> | | [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:start| Return to Recommendations ]] | <WRAP> | ||
| <html><b> | <html><b> | ||
| - | <a href="mailto:[email protected]?Subject=OMG CBDC Response: | + | <a href="mailto:[email protected]?Subject=OMG's CBDC WG Response: |
| 6.10 Adopt a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Approach | 6.10 Adopt a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Approach | ||
| ">Provide Feedback</a></b> | ">Provide Feedback</a></b> | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| </WRAP> | </WRAP> | ||
| - | The OMG members recommend the Federal Reserve define a task to define a methodology for proceeding with a [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:g:greenfield | Greenfield]] U.S. CBDC. There is a lot of risk in trying to organically define the development process. | + | The OMG's CBDC WG members recommend the Federal Reserve define a task to define a methodology for proceeding with a [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:g:greenfield | Greenfield]] U.S. CBDC. There is a lot of risk in trying to organically define the development process. |
| For more than forty years, the practice of systems engineering followed a linear path: requirements are documented | For more than forty years, the practice of systems engineering followed a linear path: requirements are documented | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| * [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:60_mbse| MBSE Overview in Appendix]]. | * [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:60_mbse| MBSE Overview in Appendix]]. | ||
| - | The [[https://www.omg.org/ | Object Management Group (OMG)]] also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]: | + | The [[https://www.omg.org/ | Object Management Group's (OMG)]] CBDC WG also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]: |
| UAFP 1.0 supports the capability to: | UAFP 1.0 supports the capability to: | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| The intent of UAF is to provide a standard representation for describing enterprise architectures using a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach. | The intent of UAF is to provide a standard representation for describing enterprise architectures using a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach. | ||
| - | The [[https://www.omg.org/ | Object Management Group ]] also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]; it is summarized here: | + | The [[https://www.omg.org/ | Object Management Group's ]] CBDC WG also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://www.omg.org/spec/UAF/ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]; it is summarized here: |
| //UAF Profile (UAFP) 1.0 supports the capability to:// | //UAF Profile (UAFP) 1.0 supports the capability to:// | ||