User Tools

Site Tools


cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:90_recomend:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:90_recomend:start [2022/05/18 00:49]
nick
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:90_recomend:start [2022/06/17 19:44] (current)
terrance
Line 3: Line 3:
 | [[cbdc:​public:​cbdc_omg:​04_doc:​90_recommend:​start| Return to Recommendations ]]  |  <​WRAP>​ | [[cbdc:​public:​cbdc_omg:​04_doc:​90_recommend:​start| Return to Recommendations ]]  |  <​WRAP>​
 <​html><​b>​ <​html><​b>​
-<a href="​mailto:​[email protected]?​Subject=OMG CBDC Response: ​+<a href="​mailto:​[email protected]?​Subject=OMG'​s ​CBDC WG Response: ​
 6.10 Adopt a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Approach 6.10 Adopt a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Approach
 ">​Provide Feedback</​a></​b>​ ">​Provide Feedback</​a></​b>​
Line 9: Line 9:
 </​WRAP>  ​ </​WRAP>  ​
  
-The OMG members recommend the Federal Reserve define a task to define a methodology for proceeding with a [[https://​www.omgwiki.org/​dido/​doku.php?​id=dido:​public:​ra:​xapend:​xapend.a_glossary:​g:​greenfield | Greenfield]] U.S. CBDC. There is a lot of risk in trying to organically define the development process.+The OMG's CBDC WG members recommend the Federal Reserve define a task to define a methodology for proceeding with a [[https://​www.omgwiki.org/​dido/​doku.php?​id=dido:​public:​ra:​xapend:​xapend.a_glossary:​g:​greenfield | Greenfield]] U.S. CBDC. There is a lot of risk in trying to organically define the development process.
  
 For more than forty years, the practice of systems engineering followed a linear path: requirements are documented For more than forty years, the practice of systems engineering followed a linear path: requirements are documented
Line 47: Line 47:
   * [[cbdc:​public:​cbdc_omg:​8_append:​60_mbse| MBSE Overview in Appendix]].   * [[cbdc:​public:​cbdc_omg:​8_append:​60_mbse| MBSE Overview in Appendix]].
  
-The [[https://​www.omg.org/​ | Object Management Group (OMG)]] also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://​www.omg.org/​spec/​UAF/​ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]:+The [[https://​www.omg.org/​ | Object Management Group'​s ​(OMG)]] ​CBDC WG also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://​www.omg.org/​spec/​UAF/​ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]:
  
 UAFP 1.0 supports the capability to: UAFP 1.0 supports the capability to:
Line 57: Line 57:
 The intent of UAF is to provide a standard representation for describing enterprise architectures using a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach. The intent of UAF is to provide a standard representation for describing enterprise architectures using a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) approach.
  
-The [[https://​www.omg.org/​ | Object Management Group ]] also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://​www.omg.org/​spec/​UAF/​ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]; it is summarized here:+The [[https://​www.omg.org/​ | Object Management Group'​s ​]] CBDC WG also recommends that the Federal Reserve use the Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) for future CBDC efforts. See [[https://​www.omg.org/​spec/​UAF/​ | OMG Unified Architecture Framework (UAF)]]; it is summarized here:
  
 //UAF Profile (UAFP) 1.0 supports the capability to:// //UAF Profile (UAFP) 1.0 supports the capability to://
cbdc/public/cbdc_omg/04_doc/90_recommend/90_recomend/start.1652849351.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/05/18 00:49 by nick