Almost all Cryptocurrencies implemented so far use the concept of tokens, accounts, wallets, transactions, and distributed ledgers. In essence, these approaches model the way money is handled in bank accounts1). However, the CBDC could also be modeled on actual cash (i.e., \$0.01, \$0.05, \$0.10, \$0.25, \$0.50 coins and \$1, \$2, \$5, \$10, \$20, \$50 and \$100 bills), in essence creating a true Digital Dollar. The Digital Dollar would create a digital coin for each of the denominations, with no further fractions. For example, a \$100 digital coin would only represent a value of $100.00 US Dollars. Representing more money would be done by collecting more \$100 digital coins, just like a real physical wallet. Representing values less than \$100 US dollars would be done using the other U.S.-denominated Digital Coins (i.e., \$1, \$5, etc). However, the Federal Reserve could issue other denominations that are higher than the \$100 bill if it chooses2). In addition, The Federal Reserve could create smaller denominations than the penny (i.e., $0.01). These denominations are impractical and too costly for real currencies but could be useful for micropayments (see B0040
). The smallest denomination would most likely be limited in granularity to the cost of running the Consensus Algorithms (See the OMG DIDO-RA discussion on Consensus).
The End User could use a Digital Cash Wallet to hold their Digital Cash. These wallets could hold not only US Digital Currencies, but also other currencies, such as Digital UK Pounds, EU Euros, Japanese Yen, etc. The characteristics of Digital Cash are much like real cash, although there are no reasons an End User can not have and use only cash. At some point, in order to manage risk from loss, theft, damage, etc., it is best to put the cash into an account at some financial institution such as a bank, savings, loan, credit union, etc.
One could also allow Digital Cash to be bundled and processed into a Digital Cash Wallet. The Digital Cash Wallet would be very similar to an actual wallet. It would contain a collection of Digital Cash coins or Certificates in an array of Digital Currency Denominations.
In the following example, the CBDC is modeled as a collection of Stablecoins, each one representing a form of physical cash (i.e., \$0.01, \$0.05, \$0.10, \$0.25, \$0.50 coins and \$1, \$2, \$5, \$10, \$20, \$50 and \$100 bills). The End User would actually “own” these Stablecoins and consequently, they would have all the same shortcomings as their physical equivalent. For example, if the Stablecoins are lost, damaged, or stolen, there is no “back-up”. Contrast this with a Digital Account Model, where there are all kinds of safeguards protecting the asset.
This lack of protection from loss, damage, or theft becomes a natural deterrent to collecting and saving these as assets, just as with real physical currency. In essence, people are free to keep large amounts of cash in their mattresses, but the risk of loss, damage, or theft is high, thus prompting most end Users to deposit the money in accounts managed by traditional financial intermediaries.
Figure 1 represents a stylized use of a Digital Cash flow of a consumer (End User) buying a product from a retail store.
|
|
In this example, the End User's Digital Cash Wallet is used to purchase an item in a store that lists for \$488.78.
Table 3 provides a possible withdrawal from the End User's Digital Cash Wallet. If the withdrawal is accepted by the Digital Cash Wallet's owner, the Digital Cash certificates ownership is changed to the stores.
Denomination | Quantity | Sum |
---|---|---|
\$100.00 | 4 | $400.00 |
\$50.00 | 1 | $50.00 |
\$20.00 | 1 | $20.00 |
\$10.00 | 1 | $10.00 |
\$5.00 | 1 | $5.00 |
\$2.00 | 0 | $0.00 |
\$1.00 | 3 | $3.00 |
\$0.50 | 1 | $0.50 |
\$0.25 | 1 | $0.25 |
\$0.10 | 0 | $0.00 |
\$0.05 | 0 | $0.00 |
\$0.01 | 3 | $0.03 |
TOTAL | $488.78 |
|
|
There are three categories of requirements alluded to in the White Paper and identified within the Object Management Group's CBDC WG White Paper Analysis:
In this discussion, only the desirements were identified during the White Paper Analysis are considered. Table 6 represents the allocated of requirements germane to the Digital Cash Model.
Category | Desirements |
---|---|
Benefits | B0003, B0004, B0007, B0009, B0013, B0018, B0020, B0022-1, B0022-2, B0022-3, B0024, B0028, B0029, B0034, B0036, B0040, B0042 |
Policies and Considerations | P0004, P0027, P0029 |
Risks | R0013 |
Design | D0001, D0006, D0007, D0009 |
B = Benefit Considerations |
|
P = Policy Considerations |
|
R = Risk Considerations |
|
D = Design Considerations |
Table 7 provides a summary of using a Digital Dollar Model instead of a Digital Account, Cryptocurrency or Stablecoin Models.
Desirement No. | Desirement Text | Comment |
---|---|---|
B0003, P0003 | Complement, rather than replace, current forms of money and methods for providing financial services | The Digital Coins are intended to work in parallel with existing systems and to follow much the same lifecycle as current paper money. The same institutions would fulfill the same roles they currently do but have added roles and responsibilities for Digital Currency. |
B0004, P0004, D0012 | Protect consumer privacy | Since the journal is kept with each individual Digital Currency rather than on a globally accessible ledger (i.e., journal) then the consumers' privacy is more obfuscated. It becomes more like paper money. |
B0005, P0005 | Protect against criminal activity | Once criminal activity is detected, the Digital Dollars collected as part of the investigation can provide invaluable information for the prosecutors as to the origins of the money. |
B0009 | Provide faster and cheaper payments (including cross-border payments) | Digital Coins can be sent using normal encrypted electronic transfer for files. |
B0013 | Provide immediate access to transferred funds | Once the Digital Coins are transferred to a payee, the money can be spent exactly like cash |
B0030 | Support benefit payments directly to citizens | Not only can the payments be made directly to the citizens, but the payments may be colored by category: rent, medicine, food, communication, etc. |
B0040 | Provide micropayment support | Micropayments are financial transactions involving very small amounts of money and usually occur online. A number of micropayment systems were proposed and developed in the mid-to-late 1990s, all of which were ultimately unsuccessful. 3). The smallest amount of money that can be paid as a micropayment must be more than the cost of obtaining Consensus (See the OMG DIDO-RA discussion on Consensus) |
B0046 | Enable rapid and cost-effective delivery of:
| Digital Coins would be immediately available. |
R0001 | Risk of affecting financial-sector market structure | Since the Digital Coins would follow the existing Currency Lifecycle and the major financial institutions will have the same roles as they currently have, there should be minimal disruption to the existing financial structure |
R0010 | CBDC has a Risk of significant energy footprint similar to Cryptocurrencies | The use of Digital Coins does not require the costly Consensus Algorithms, the energy cost should be insignificant. |
D0001 | Design should be for a non-interest-bearing CBDC, for example, would be less attractive as a substitute for commercial bank money | Digital Dollars would be for all intents and purposes be the same as current paper money. It does not accumulate interest until it is deposited in a financial institution. |