This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
shared_semantics [2011/10/13 12:42] mikehypercube Added 06 Oct link |
shared_semantics [2012/02/07 15:12] (current) mikehypercube Identify different streams of Shared Semantics |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ===== Workstream Summary ===== | ===== Workstream Summary ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are broadly two sets of activities under the banner of "Shared Semantics": | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The technical treatments for the Shared Semantics framework in the Global Terms sections of FIBO (technical OMG work) | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Individual streams of semantic alignment activities among business specialists. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The notes and working on this page relate mainly to the first of the above. Shared semantics in the broader sense is therefore filed separately from the [[start]] page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Goals of this Track ==== | ||
| + | |||
| * **Goal:** Identification and evaluation of shared semantic models to avoid duplication of efforts and eliminate ambiguity | * **Goal:** Identification and evaluation of shared semantic models to avoid duplication of efforts and eliminate ambiguity | ||
| Line 16: | Line 28: | ||
| Back to [[start]] | Back to [[start]] | ||
| - | ===== Interesting Links ===== | + | ===== Session Notes ===== |
| + | Most recent first: | ||
| - | This paper on ontologies integration (the HETS project): | + | [[WS3 Thursday 17 November]] |
| - | [[http://dream.inf.ed.ac.uk/projects/CT-Ontology/Ontology%20Merging%20with%20V-alignment%20in%20Hets.pdf|Ontology Merging with V-alignments in HETS by Liwei Deng]] | + | [[WS3 Thursday 10 November]] |
| - | ===== Working Documents ===== | + | [[WS3 Thursday 03 November]] |
| - | ==== Ways of Referencing Other Standards ==== | + | [[WS3 Thursday 27 October]] |
| - | See working document {{:20110929_ways_of_referencing_other_standards.doc|Ways of Referencing Other Standards}} | + | |
| - | ==== REA OWL Ontologies ==== | + | [[WS3 Thursday 20 October]] |
| - | Per recent correspondence from Bill McCarthy, the normative version of REA should be considered as being the UML model identified in the ISO documentation. | + | |
| - | Meanwhile this is what MB has received, from Frederik Gailly in Feb 2011: | + | [[WS3 Thursday 13 October]] |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{:rea.zip|REA.zip - archive containing GIF and some other files}} | + | |
| - | {{:project_zipfilerea.zip| - archive containing an RDF file and some other files}} | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Address Pilot Working Notes ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For the current "Pilot" experiments on address terms: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | {{:address_semantics_alignment_v2.doc|Address Semantics working document (version 2)}} | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Session Notes ===== | + | |
| - | In reverse order: | + | |
| [[WS3 Thursday 06 October]] | [[WS3 Thursday 06 October]] | ||
| Line 64: | Line 63: | ||
| + | ===== Working Documents ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Named Graphs ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Working document {{:named_graphs.doc|Named Graphs}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | Exploratory document, prepared by Kevin Tyson: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:publishing_subsets_of_rdf_specifications.docx|Publishing Subsets of RDF Specifications}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Standards Selection Matrix ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:selection_grid_v3.xls|Grid of possible standards and the criteria which are relevant in their selection}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Business Entity and Dependent Sections ==== | ||
| + | Serialized (XMI) Exports from all the sections that Business Endity depends on. | ||
| + | To be uploaded - right now it refuses to do it for some reason. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Ways of Referencing Other Standards ==== | ||
| + | Working document outlinng the formal treatments by which other standards are to be referenced. To be included in the RFC specificaiton document as an appendix: | ||
| + | {{:2011103-referencingstandards.doc|Ways of Referencing Other Standards}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== REA OWL Ontologies ==== | ||
| + | Per recent correspondence from Bill McCarthy, the normative version of REA should be considered as being the UML model identified in the ISO documentation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Meanwhile this is what MB has received, from Frederik Gailly in Feb 2011: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:rea.zip|REA.zip - archive containing GIF and some other files}} | ||
| + | {{:project_zipfilerea.zip| - archive containing an RDF file and some other files}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Address Pilot Working Notes ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | For the current "Pilot" experiments on address terms: | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:address_semantics_alignment_v2.doc|Address Semantics working document (version 2)}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====== Further Reading ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Interesting Links ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This paper on ontologies integration (the HETS project): | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[http://dream.inf.ed.ac.uk/projects/CT-Ontology/Ontology%20Merging%20with%20V-alignment%20in%20Hets.pdf|Ontology Merging with V-alignments in HETS by Liwei Deng]] | ||