User Tools
ws2_thursday_29_september
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
ws2_thursday_29_september [2011/10/10 07:43] mikehypercube |
ws2_thursday_29_september [2011/10/10 07:46] (current) mikehypercube |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| The bulk of this work will be concluded off line from these sessions. | The bulk of this work will be concluded off line from these sessions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Implementation: === | ||
| + | * DC Terms | ||
| + | * SKOS terms | ||
| + | * SBVR terms | ||
| + | * New OMG change management metadata | ||
| + | |||
| + | Much of what we are looking for is in the spreadsheet that Elisa sent. Development additional metadata terms to support this. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Can't round trip informal stuff. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Definition: should be in metadata. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Develop some template for adding this stuff. We would need to add something to tooling so we want to be able to take what's in the OWL Annotation Property for "Definition", and automatically clone this into the UML "Notes" construct so that people can see it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We don't care so much about having "Further Notes". | ||
| + | |||
| + | Action: Look into how to get the things in Annotation Properties and get them into the Notes construct. Would also potentially be able to make ways of accessing the content of e.g. "Further Notes" visible. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Consensus: What if we can only clone the definition to the Notes field, and the rest is accessible via the official Adaptive interface. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Avoid tool specific integrations where possible. Apart from the Notes field, which maps into "UML Comment" and is owned by the elements and so can be round tripped. | ||
| + | |||
| ==== Rendering ==== | ==== Rendering ==== | ||
| Line 68: | Line 91: | ||
| From this, it seems that we will be looking to use OWL Annotation Property. | From this, it seems that we will be looking to use OWL Annotation Property. | ||
| - | ==== Discussion ==== | + | === Discussion === |
| We know we are going to render them as OWL Annotation Properties. | We know we are going to render them as OWL Annotation Properties. | ||
ws2_thursday_29_september.1318247037.txt.gz · Last modified: 2011/10/10 07:43 by mikehypercube
Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International
