sysml-roadmap:requirement_concepts_modeling_core_team
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
sysml-roadmap:requirement_concepts_modeling_core_team [2016-12-15 06:51] jwatson [Requirements Analysis] |
sysml-roadmap:requirement_concepts_modeling_core_team [2017-03-08 12:47] jwatson [Latest Working Documents] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| ===== Latest Working Documents ===== | ===== Latest Working Documents ===== | ||
| - | === SE Needs Reference Material === | + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:sysml_v2_rfp_requirements_for_requirements-sf-2017-03-08.docx |Draft SysML v2 RFP Requirements for Requirements, dated 08 Mar 2017 **Latest Working Document**}} |
| - | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:requirements_and_verification_needs_r2-2.docx |Requirements/Verification Needs R2.2 10/13/2016 **Working Document**}} | + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_07_mar_2017.pptx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams 07 Mar 2017 **Latest Working Document**}} |
| - | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_11-15-16.pptx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams 11/15/2016 **Working Document**}} | + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:rfp_requirements_for_requirements-sf-e.docx |Draft Requirements for Requirements (Rev e), posted 22 Feb 2017}} |
| - | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:definitions_for_reqs_and_verification_11-15-16.xlsx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Term Definitions 11/15/2016 **Working Document**}} \\ | + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_08_feb_2017.pptx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams 08 Feb 2017}} |
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:sysml_v2_glossary_-_requirements_08_feb_2017.docx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Term Definitions 08 Feb 2017 **Latest Working Document**}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_09_jan_2017.pptx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams 09 Jan 2017}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_31_dec_2016.pptx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams 31 Dec 2016}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_20_dec_2016.pptx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams 20 Dec 2016}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:requirements_and_verification_needs_r2-2.docx |Requirements/Verification Needs R2.2 - 13 Oct 2016}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:definitions_for_reqs_and_verification_11-15-16.xlsx |Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Term Definitions 15 Nov 2016}} \\ | ||
| ===== Limitations of SysML v1 ===== | ===== Limitations of SysML v1 ===== | ||
| Line 38: | Line 44: | ||
| ===== Requirements Analysis ===== | ===== Requirements Analysis ===== | ||
| === 1. Propose updates to current concept model to address verification related feedback from Brian, David, and one item from Tao/Shaukat – Brian Selvy and David Haines (Note: Discuss scope of verification related concepts such as verification planning for SysML v2.) === | === 1. Propose updates to current concept model to address verification related feedback from Brian, David, and one item from Tao/Shaukat – Brian Selvy and David Haines (Note: Discuss scope of verification related concepts such as verification planning for SysML v2.) === | ||
| + | * Completed - The SECM has been updated to included the Verification Concepts | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:verification_concepts_for_sysml_12-21-16_revision.pptx |Updated Proposal Presentation for Verification Concepts for SysML V2, 21 Dec 2016, Brian and Dave}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:iv_mapping_to_sysml_12-15-16_brian_and_david.xlsx |IV Mapping to SysML, 15 Dec 2016, Brian and David}} | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:verification_concepts_for_sysml_12-14-16_revision_brain_and_david.pptx |Updated Proposal Presentation for Verification Concepts for SysML V2, 14 Dec 2016, Brian and Dave}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:verification_concepts_for_sysml_12-14-16_revision_brain_and_david.pptx |Updated Proposal Presentation for Verification Concepts for SysML V2, 14 Dec 2016, Brian and Dave}} | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:iv_mapping_to_sysml_12-13-16_brian_and_david.xlsx |IV Mapping to SysML, 13 Dec 2016, Brian and David}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:iv_mapping_to_sysml_12-13-16_brian_and_david.xlsx |IV Mapping to SysML, 13 Dec 2016, Brian and David}} | ||
| Line 49: | Line 58: | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_10-18-16_reviewedbybertilmuth.pptx |Comments and 1st Proposal Presentation, 18 Oct 2016, Bertil Muth}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_requirements_concepts_diagrams_10-18-16_reviewedbybertilmuth.pptx |Comments and 1st Proposal Presentation, 18 Oct 2016, Bertil Muth}} | ||
| === 3. Review requirements relationships in current concept model and propose a draft taxonomy and definition of relationships for SysML v2 – Rick Steiner and Brian Selvy=== | === 3. Review requirements relationships in current concept model and propose a draft taxonomy and definition of relationships for SysML v2 – Rick Steiner and Brian Selvy=== | ||
| - | * Next session scheduled for 21 Dec 2016 | + | * Completed - 01 Feb 2017 |
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:20170201_discussion.pptx |Requirements Relationships slides, updated after web conference, 01 Feb 2017, Rick and Brian}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:sysml_v2_rquirement_relationships_-_20170131_discussion.pptx |Requirement Relationships slides, 01 Feb 2017, Rick and Brian}} | ||
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:sysml_v2_rquirement_relationships_-_20170104_discussion.pptx |Requirement Relationships slides, 04 Jan 2017, Rick and Brian}} | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:reqts_vs_archetypes_30_nov_2016_rick_steiner.pptx |Requirements vs. Archetypes, 30 Nov 2016, Rick}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:reqts_vs_archetypes_30_nov_2016_rick_steiner.pptx |Requirements vs. Archetypes, 30 Nov 2016, Rick}} | ||
| * This presentation was provided by Rick on 30 Nov 2016. It raises a general question/concern regarding requirements as classifiers vs requirements as properties | * This presentation was provided by Rick on 30 Nov 2016. It raises a general question/concern regarding requirements as classifiers vs requirements as properties | ||
| Line 56: | Line 68: | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:lsst_specification-definition_example.pdf |LSST Specification-Definition Example, 02 Nov 2016, Brian Selvy}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:lsst_specification-definition_example.pdf |LSST Specification-Definition Example, 02 Nov 2016, Brian Selvy}} | ||
| === 4. Propose how uncertainty should be addressed in SysML v2 using the current concept model and starting with the weight requirement example (Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams, slides 7-9) - Tao Yue and Shaukat Ali === | === 4. Propose how uncertainty should be addressed in SysML v2 using the current concept model and starting with the weight requirement example (Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams, slides 7-9) - Tao Yue and Shaukat Ali === | ||
| - | * Completed pending listed actions below - Sandy asked for feedback to Tao and Shaukat proposed approach to deal with requirements uncertainty that they presented at the 23 Nov telecom. Sandy proposed the following: | + | * Completed - Actions listed below have been closed - Sandy asked for feedback to Tao and Shaukat proposed approach to deal with requirements uncertainty that they presented at the 23 Nov telecom. Sandy proposed the following: |
| - Include a non-normative requirement in the SysML v2 RFP for a structured natural language text requirements that incorporates concepts of uncertainty. Refer to Tao/Shaukat’s approach as a potential solution. | - Include a non-normative requirement in the SysML v2 RFP for a structured natural language text requirements that incorporates concepts of uncertainty. Refer to Tao/Shaukat’s approach as a potential solution. | ||
| - Treat the general issue of uncertainty more generally than requirements alone. Focus initially on the uncertainty of property values. Ensure the ability to distinguish different types of uncertainty, such as the uncertainty associated with unit to unit variation (e.g., uncertainty of weight of different manufactured systems) and the uncertainty associated with a property over time due to many different system and environmental uncertainties (e.g. variation in fuel efficiency or engine temperature for a particular vehicle over time) | - Treat the general issue of uncertainty more generally than requirements alone. Focus initially on the uncertainty of property values. Ensure the ability to distinguish different types of uncertainty, such as the uncertainty associated with unit to unit variation (e.g., uncertainty of weight of different manufactured systems) and the uncertainty associated with a property over time due to many different system and environmental uncertainties (e.g. variation in fuel efficiency or engine temperature for a particular vehicle over time) | ||
| - Action: Tao/Shaukat confirm this is an acceptable proposal - Closed, Tao responded "It is a good proposal. We accept it." | - Action: Tao/Shaukat confirm this is an acceptable proposal - Closed, Tao responded "It is a good proposal. We accept it." | ||
| - | - Action: If confirmed, John to add this requirement and add Tao/Shaukat Structured Natural Language metamodel into the concept model as an example - OPEN | + | - Action: If confirmed, John to add this requirement and add Tao/Shaukat Structured Natural Language metamodel into the concept model as an example - Closed |
| - | - Action: Sandy coordinate with Hans Peter to ensure probabilities are sufficiently addressed in the Properties and Expressions concepts - OPEN | + | - Action: Sandy coordinate with Hans Peter to ensure probabilities are sufficiently addressed in the Properties and Expressions concepts - Closed |
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_uncertainty_nov._23_2016.pptx |Proposal Update for SysML V2 Uncertainty, 23 Nov 2016, Shaukat and Tao}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_uncertainty_nov._23_2016.pptx |Proposal Update for SysML V2 Uncertainty, 23 Nov 2016, Shaukat and Tao}} | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_uncertainty.pptx | Initial Proposal for SysML V2 Uncertainty, 09 Nov 2016, Shaukat and Tao}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_uncertainty.pptx | Initial Proposal for SysML V2 Uncertainty, 09 Nov 2016, Shaukat and Tao}} | ||
| === 5. Propose how current concept model can support scenario based requirements using natural language starting with the behavior example (Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams, slide 12) – Tao Yue and Shaukat Ali === | === 5. Propose how current concept model can support scenario based requirements using natural language starting with the behavior example (Requirements/Verification SECM Concept Diagrams, slide 12) – Tao Yue and Shaukat Ali === | ||
| - | * Completed - See Item 4 above. | + | * Completed - See Item 4 above. |
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:restricted_textual_requirements_-_background_definition_proposal_and_examples_tao_yue_-_06_feb_2017.pptx |Restricted Textual Requirements - Background Definition Proposal and Examples - 06 Feb 2017 - Tao Yue}} | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_restricted_textual_requirements_by_tao_yue_and_shaukat_ali_on_nov._1_of_2016.pptx |Updated Proposal Presentation, 1 Nov 2016, Tao and Shaukat, Includes comparison to other existing solutions}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_restricted_textual_requirements_by_tao_yue_and_shaukat_ali_on_nov._1_of_2016.pptx |Updated Proposal Presentation, 1 Nov 2016, Tao and Shaukat, Includes comparison to other existing solutions}} | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_restricted_textual_requirements_by_tao_yue_and_shaukat_ali_on_oct._19_of_2016.pptx |1st Proposal Presentation, 19 Oct 2016, Tao and Shaukat}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:secm_-_requirements_concepts_-_restricted_textual_requirements_by_tao_yue_and_shaukat_ali_on_oct._19_of_2016.pptx |1st Proposal Presentation, 19 Oct 2016, Tao and Shaukat}} | ||
| === 6. Contrast the approaches to Structured Natural Language Requirements approaches – Tao Yue and Shaukat Ali === | === 6. Contrast the approaches to Structured Natural Language Requirements approaches – Tao Yue and Shaukat Ali === | ||
| + | * Completed - Presentation and discussion on 14 Dec 2016 closed this item. | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:discussion_on_the_different_structured_and_restricted_nl_based_approaches_-_tao_and_shaukat_dec._14_of_2016.pptx |Discussion on the different structured and restricted NL based approaches, 14 Dec 2016, Tao and Shaukat}} | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:discussion_on_the_different_structured_and_restricted_nl_based_approaches_-_tao_and_shaukat_dec._14_of_2016.pptx |Discussion on the different structured and restricted NL based approaches, 14 Dec 2016, Tao and Shaukat}} | ||
| === 7. Discuss Bjorn Cole feedback regarding embedding the required properties and constraints in a block. Sandy Friedenthal === | === 7. Discuss Bjorn Cole feedback regarding embedding the required properties and constraints in a block. Sandy Friedenthal === | ||
| - | * Tentatively Bjorn Cole from JPL is scheduled to present his concept ideas on 11 Jan 2016. | + | * Complete - Bjorn presented his concepts on 11 Jan 2017. |
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:simplified_vehicle_requirement_example_with_concepts_11jan_2017_bjorn_cole.pptx |Simplified vehicle requirement example with concepts, 11 Jan 2017, Bjorn Cole}} | ||
| === 8. Assess the mapping between SysML v2 concepts and ReqIF concepts, and provide recommendations for potential future alignment – Bertil Muth=== | === 8. Assess the mapping between SysML v2 concepts and ReqIF concepts, and provide recommendations for potential future alignment – Bertil Muth=== | ||
| * Completed - Bertil provided presentation below on 30 Nov 2016. | * Completed - Bertil provided presentation below on 30 Nov 2016. | ||
| * {{ :sysml-roadmap:sysmlv2reqif1.2alignmentproposal_-_bertil_muth_10-18-16.pptx | Presentation of ReqIF Alignment, 18 Oct 2016, Bertil}} See slides 6 and 7. | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:sysmlv2reqif1.2alignmentproposal_-_bertil_muth_10-18-16.pptx | Presentation of ReqIF Alignment, 18 Oct 2016, Bertil}} See slides 6 and 7. | ||
| + | === 9. Review the integration concepts and their relationship to the verification concepts – Brian, David === | ||
| + | * Meeting discussion date TBD | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 82: | Line 98: | ||
| ===== References ===== | ===== References ===== | ||
| - | [[sysml-roadmap:requirements_modeling_working_group|Requirement Modeling Working Group - Earlier working group focused on improvements to SysML 1.X]] | + | |
| + | * {{ :sysml-roadmap:requirement_concepts_-_12-08-2016_omg_tech_meeting_sysml_v2_rfp_working_group_mtg_r2_-_coronado_ca_-_watson.pptx |Requirement Concepts WG Status, OMG Technical Meeting, 08 Dec 2016, SysML v2 RFP Working Group Meeting, John Watson}} | ||
| + | * [[sysml-roadmap:requirements_modeling_working_group|Requirement Modeling Working Group - Earlier working group focused on improvements to SysML 1.X]] | ||
sysml-roadmap/requirement_concepts_modeling_core_team.txt · Last modified: 2017-03-12 12:13 by jwatson
Page Tools
