academic_wg_seattle_meeting_09_dec_2018
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
academic_wg_seattle_meeting_09_dec_2018 [2018/12/10 00:45] cbaudoin_cebe-itkm.com |
academic_wg_seattle_meeting_09_dec_2018 [2018/12/10 02:25] jsmith |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
| Jason also proposed that we should define the contents of the "lightweight certification" program for various OMG standards. This is a second action items to accomplish before the next meeting. | Jason also proposed that we should define the contents of the "lightweight certification" program for various OMG standards. This is a second action items to accomplish before the next meeting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Concrete goals for this OMG Meeting: | ||
| + | 1) Write a questionnaire intended for specification owners, which attempts to capture the two questions above, using language such as: | ||
| + | a) "Think on the specifications that are authored by your task force. If you had access to undergraduate and/or graduate level students, what projects would you ask them to do? Test creation? Validation? Research? Novel applications? User studies?" | ||
| + | b) "What are the core concepts or information that you wish undergraduate and graduate level students knew about your specifications? Would that provide a basic practical working knowledge? Would it give a simple base such that they could investigate further on their own?" | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2) Send questionnaire to all task force chairs, and specifically to those chairing TFs owning 'the big specs' (see above list) | ||
academic_wg_seattle_meeting_09_dec_2018.txt ยท Last modified: 2018/12/10 02:37 by jsmith
Page Tools
