This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
academic_wg_seattle_meeting_09_dec_2018 [2018/12/10 02:25] jsmith |
academic_wg_seattle_meeting_09_dec_2018 [2018/12/10 02:37] jsmith |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Concrete goals for this OMG Meeting: | Concrete goals for this OMG Meeting: | ||
- | 1) Write a questionnaire intended for specification owners, which attempts to capture the two questions above, using language such as: | + | - Write a questionnaire intended for specification owners, which attempts to capture the two questions above, using language such as: |
- | a) "Think on the specifications that are authored by your task force. If you had access to undergraduate and/or graduate level students, what projects would you ask them to do? Test creation? Validation? Research? Novel applications? User studies?" | + | - "Think on the specifications that are authored by your task force. If you had access to undergraduate and/or graduate level students, what projects would you ask them to do? Test creation? Validation? Research? Novel applications? User studies?" |
- | b) "What are the core concepts or information that you wish undergraduate and graduate level students knew about your specifications? Would that provide a basic practical working knowledge? Would it give a simple base such that they could investigate further on their own?" | + | - "What are the core concepts or information that you wish undergraduate and graduate level students knew about your specifications? Would that provide a basic practical working knowledge? Would it give a simple base such that they could investigate further on their own?" |
- | + | - Send questionnaire to all task force chairs, and specifically to those chairing TFs owning 'the big specs' (see above list), with a requested response by Jan 7, 2019. | |
- | 2) Send questionnaire to all task force chairs, and specifically to those chairing TFs owning 'the big specs' (see above list) | + |