This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
start [2018/09/23 18:05] admin [Meetings] Put Ottawa meeting mentions in the past tense |
start [2018/09/23 18:40] admin [RFPs] Added mention to the Provenance & Pedigree mailing list |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
There are three RFPs in progress or under consideration that fall under the purview of the DGWG, although they will need to be issued by a Task Force (such as MARS or ADTF) when the time comes. These are: | There are three RFPs in progress or under consideration that fall under the purview of the DGWG, although they will need to be issued by a Task Force (such as MARS or ADTF) when the time comes. These are: | ||
- | * an RFP on Data Provenance & Pedigree | + | * an RFP on Data Provenance & Pedigree -- discussed on the [email protected] mailing list |
* the RFP started in the C4I Task Force on Data Tagging & Labeling (this may remain in C4I, but we expect the DGWG to have a role in improving it, and in particular to expand its focus beyond DoD and NATO requirements) | * the RFP started in the C4I Task Force on Data Tagging & Labeling (this may remain in C4I, but we expect the DGWG to have a role in improving it, and in particular to expand its focus beyond DoD and NATO requirements) | ||
- | * an RFP on a formal language to represent data residency laws and regulations --- an effort discussed at several successive meetings of the Data Residency Working Group | + | * an RFP on a formal language to represent data residency laws and regulations --- an effort discussed at several successive meetings of the Data Residency Working Group. |
==== Call for Participation ==== | ==== Call for Participation ==== |