ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:t:topicname
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:t:topicname [2020/09/16 13:50] murphy |
ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:t:topicname [2021/07/14 16:45] (current) murphy ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===== Topic Name ===== | ===== Topic Name ===== | ||
| - | [[ddsf:private:cookbook:06_append:glossary| Return to Glossary ]] | + | [[ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:start| Return to Glossary ]] |
| **Topic Name**, | **Topic Name**, | ||
| - | While it is true that the [[ddsf:private:cookbook:06_append:glossary:d:data_distribution_service_dds]] [[ddsf:private:cookbook:06_append:glossary:a:api | API]] specification does not mention a limit for Topic names. The complementary DDS Wire Protocol specification: Real-Time Publish Subscribe (RTPS) protocol (http://www.omg.org/spec/DDSI-RTPS/2.2), does state that Topic names shall not exceed 256 characters (see Table 9.12). | + | while it is true that the [[ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:d:data_distribution_service_dds]] [[ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:a:api| API]] specification does not mention a limit for [[ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:t:topic|Topic]] names, the complementary DDS [[ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:w:wireprotocol|Wire Protocol]] specification: [[ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:glossary:r:rtps]] protocol (http://www.omg.org/spec/DDSI-RTPS/2.2) does state that Topic names shall not exceed 256 characters (see Table 9.12). |
| - | So the 256 character limit on Topic name lengths imposed by the RTI DDS implementation is not arbitrary. It is precisely what is required to be interoperable with other DDS implementations. | + | So the 256 character limit on Topic name lengths imposed by the [[ddsf:public:guidebook:06_append:05_vendors:rti]] DDS implementation is not arbitrary. It is precisely what is required to be interoperable with other DDS implementations. |
| Source: [[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27970321/limit-on-dds-topic-names#:~:text=The%20complementary%20DDS%20Wire%20Protocol,DDS%20implementation%20is%20not%20arbitrary. | Topic Name ]] | Source: [[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27970321/limit-on-dds-topic-names#:~:text=The%20complementary%20DDS%20Wire%20Protocol,DDS%20implementation%20is%20not%20arbitrary. | Topic Name ]] | ||
ddsf/public/guidebook/06_append/glossary/t/topicname.1600278618.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/09/16 13:50 by murphy
