User Tools

Site Tools


dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:m:must_req

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:m:must_req [2021/06/15 13:57]
char
dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:m:must_req [2021/10/04 11:54] (current)
207.46.13.176 ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation
Line 1: Line 1:
 ===== Must (Requirement) ===== ===== Must (Requirement) =====
-[[dido:​public:​ra:​xapend:​xapend.a_glossary| Return to Glossary ]]+[[dido:​public:​ra:​xapend:​xapend.a_glossary:start| Return to Glossary ]]
  
  
-**Must is not per se the specification of a requirement**,​ in fact **Must** should not be use because no one has defined how must is different from shall. ​ Also, shall has held up in court, must has not.  Granted, must does sounds stronger, right? ​ I mean, if your boss tells you that you “must” do something, well you are going to do it.  But, when writing requirements, ​ keep things simple and just use shall.+**Must is not per se the specification of a requirement**,​ in fact **Must** should not be use because no one has defined how must is different from shall. ​ Also, shall has held up in court, must has not.  Granted, must does sounds stronger, right? ​ I mean, if your boss tells you that you “must” do something, well you are going to do it.  But, when writing ​[[dido:​public:​ra:​xapend:​xapend.a_glossary:​r:​requirement|requirements]],  keep things simple and just use shall. 
 + 
 +Also see: [[dido:​public:​ra:​xapend:​xapend.b_stds:​tech:​ietf:​2119]]
  
 Source: [[https://​reqexperts.com/​2012/​10/​09/​using-the-correct-terms-shall-will-should/​ ]] Source: [[https://​reqexperts.com/​2012/​10/​09/​using-the-correct-terms-shall-will-should/​ ]]
dido/public/ra/xapend/xapend.a_glossary/m/must_req.1623779874.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/06/15 13:57 by char