dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:t:topicname
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:t:topicname [2021/06/23 09:24] char |
— (current) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ===== Topic Name ===== | ||
| - | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary| Return to Glossary ]] | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Topic Name**, | ||
| - | while it is true that the [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:d:dds]] [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:a:api| API]] specification does not mention a limit for [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:t:topic|Topic]] names, the complementary DDS [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:w:wireprotocol|Wire Protocol]] specification: [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:r:rtps]] protocol (http://www.omg.org/spec/DDSI-RTPS/2.2) does state that Topic names shall not exceed 256 characters (see Table 9.12). | ||
| - | |||
| - | So the 256 character limit on Topic name lengths imposed by the Real Time Innovations (RTI)'s DDS implementation is not arbitrary. It is precisely what is required to be interoperable with other DDS implementations. | ||
| - | |||
| - | Source: [[https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27970321/limit-on-dds-topic-names#:~:text=The%20complementary%20DDS%20Wire%20Protocol,DDS%20implementation%20is%20not%20arbitrary. | Topic Name ]] | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | /**=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | ||
| - | /* To add a discussion page to this page, comment out the line that says | ||
| - | ~~DISCUSSION:off~~ | ||
| - | */ | ||
| - | ~~DISCUSSION:on|Outstanding Issues~~ | ||
| - | ~~DISCUSSION:off~~ | ||
dido/public/ra/xapend/xapend.a_glossary/t/topicname.1624454655.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/06/23 09:24 by char
