This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model:start [2021/08/13 11:14] murphy |
dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model:start [2021/10/02 19:37] (current) nick ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| ==== Regulation ==== | ==== Regulation ==== | ||
| - | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model | Return to Top]] | + | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model:start| Return to Top]] |
| Regulations are formal, codified authoritative rules. They are adopted by a public regulatory agency and are usually interpretations of statutes passed by a legislative body. | Regulations are formal, codified authoritative rules. They are adopted by a public regulatory agency and are usually interpretations of statutes passed by a legislative body. | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| ==== Compliance ==== | ==== Compliance ==== | ||
| - | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model | Return to Top]] | + | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model:start| Return to Top]] |
| - | Compliance ensures that regulations are met through observation, measurement or testing. Good governance cleanly and effectively separates the responsibility for creating regulations from the enforcement of these regulations. This does not mean that regulations can be developed in a vacuum; they must be written to be enforceable using objective measures of compliance. Therefore, the line between regulation and compliance is not fixed and rigid but needs to be negotiated with validation of regulations from the compliance aspect. | + | Compliance ensures that regulations are met through observation, measurement or testing. Good governance cleanly and effectively separates the responsibility for creating regulations from the enforcement of these regulations. This does not mean that regulations can be developed in a vacuum; they must be written to be enforceable using objective measures of compliance. Therefore, the line between regulation and compliance is not fixed and rigid but needs to be negotiated with [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:v:validation|validation]] of regulations from the compliance aspect. |
| <figure ComplianceModel> | <figure ComplianceModel> | ||
| Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| ==== Execution ==== | ==== Execution ==== | ||
| - | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model | Return to Top]] | + | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.j_gov_model:start| Return to Top]] |
| Execution is the aspect of governance charged with actually fulfilling formal, codified authoritative rules specified by regulation to those specifications provided by compliance. The responsibility for executing the regulation rarely, if ever, falls on the legislative body or those responsible for enforcing compliance with the regulation. Without execution, the other aspects of Governance are meaningless. Consequently, any discussion of governance must include the Execution Aspect. | Execution is the aspect of governance charged with actually fulfilling formal, codified authoritative rules specified by regulation to those specifications provided by compliance. The responsibility for executing the regulation rarely, if ever, falls on the legislative body or those responsible for enforcing compliance with the regulation. Without execution, the other aspects of Governance are meaningless. Consequently, any discussion of governance must include the Execution Aspect. | ||