This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.k_consensus:02_mechanism:poauth [2021/07/16 19:05] nick created |
dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.k_consensus:02_mechanism:poauth [2021/08/13 13:56] (current) murphy |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Proof of Identity (PoI) ====== | + | ====== Proof of Authority (PoAuth) ====== |
| [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.k_consensus:02_mechanism:start | Return to Consensus Mechanism ]] | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.k_consensus:02_mechanism:start | Return to Consensus Mechanism ]] | ||
| - | **Proof of Identity (PoI)** is just like that of the authorized identity. PoI is a cryptographic confirmation for a users’ private key that is being attached to each particular transaction. Each identified user can create and manage a block of data that can be presented to others in the network. | + | Sandre provides the following definition(( |
| + | Nicolò De Sandre, | ||
| + | Leiden Institute of Advanced Computer Science (LIACS) | ||
| + | Leiden University, | ||
| + | __A Multicriteria Evaluation of Blockchain Technologies in the Healthcare System__, | ||
| + | page 35, | ||
| + | 2 November 2018, | ||
| + | Accessed 18 July 2021, | ||
| + | [[https://theses.liacs.nl/pdf/2018-2019-DeSandreNicolo.pdf]] | ||
| + | )): | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | **[[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:p:proof_of_authority_poa|Proof of Authority (PoAuth)]]** or **(PoA)**is an alternative consensus algorithm, a modified [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:p:proof_of_stake_pos|Proof of Stake]] in which a validator’s identity replaces the role of the stake and, the nodes | ||
| + | validating blocks are the ones explicitly allowed to do so. This peculiarity of Proof | ||
| + | of Authority diversifies it from PoS since it allows to take into account the different | ||
| + | interests that two nodes, even with the same amount of stake, may have in the | ||
| + | network. A set of selected authorities has to create new blocks and secure the | ||
| + | [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:b:blockchain|blockchain]]. The majority of the authorities have to agree on the current status of | ||
| + | the transactions, and to sign off the chain; only then, it can be added to the | ||
| + | blockchain and become permanent. The identity of a validator denotes the | ||
| + | “congruity between a validator’s [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:i:identification|identification]] on a [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:p:platform|platform]] with his official | ||
| + | documents, i.e. certainty that a validator is exactly whom that person represents to | ||
| + | be.” A robust process at assessing whether the validators are whom they claim to be 24 | ||
| + | or not is needed, and difficult eligibility ensures validators to be a scarce resource, | ||
| + | this incentivizes them to retain the position they have earned since it is unpleasant | ||
| + | to lose. “Individuals whose identity, and reputation is at stake for the securing of a | ||
| + | network are incentivized to preserve the network.” | ||
| + | |||
| + | To recap, with PoA consensus is essential to: first, establish that validators’ | ||
| + | identity is true, and second, make validators’ eligibility for staking hard to obtain | ||
| + | through multiple exams. This creates integrity and transparency within the | ||
| + | validators and the network, ensuring trust and lowering the risk fo nefarious | ||
| + | threats. | ||
| - | This blockchain consensus model ensures the authenticity and integrity of the created data. And thus, is a good choice for introducing smart cities.[[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.k_consensus:09_ref:bhardwaj]] | ||
| /**=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | /**=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- | ||