User Tools

Site Tools


dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.b_stds:tech:ietf:7595

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.b_stds:tech:ietf:7595 [2022/01/24 10:20] (current)
nick created
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== RFC7595 - Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes ======
 +[[dido:​public:​ra:​xapend:​xapend.b_stds:​tech:​ietf:​start| return to the IETF Standards ]]
 +
 +<​table>​
 +<​caption>​Data sheet for RFC7595 Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes (AAAA)</​caption>​
 +| Title                      | Guidelines and Registration Procedures for URI Schemes |
 +| Acronym ​                   | URI Schemes |
 +| Version ​                   | 2015 |
 +| Document Number ​           | RFC7595 |
 +| Release Date               | June 2015  |
 +| Reference ​                 | [[https://​tools.ietf.org/​html/​rfc7595]] |
 +</​table>​
 +
 +  : **Note**: The following is an excerpt from the official IETF RFC. It is provided here as a convenience and is not authoritative. Refer to the original document as the authoritative reference.
 +
 +
 +===== Introduction =====
 +
 +The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) protocol element and generic
 +syntax is defined by [RFC3986]. ​ Each URI begins with a scheme name,
 +as defined by Section 3.1 of RFC 3986, that refers to a specification
 +for identifiers within that scheme. ​ The URI syntax provides a
 +federated and extensible naming system, where each scheme'​s
 +specification can further restrict the syntax and define the
 +semantics of identifiers using that scheme.
 +
 +This document obsoletes [RFC4395], which in turn obsoleted [RFC2717]
 +and [RFC2718]. ​ Recent documents have used the term "​URI"​ for all
 +resource identifiers,​ avoiding the term "​URL"​ and reserving the term
 +"​URN"​ explicitly for those URIs using the "​urn"​ scheme name
 +[RFC2141]. ​ URN "​namespaces"​ [RFC3406] are specific to the "​urn"​
 +scheme and are not covered explicitly by this specification.
 +
 +This document provides updated guidelines for the definition of new
 +schemes, for consideration by those who are defining, registering,​ or
 +evaluating those definitions. ​ In addition, this document provides an
 +updated process and mechanism for registering schemes within the IANA
 +URI Schemes registry. ​ There is a single namespace for registered
 +schemes. ​ The intent of the registry is to:
 +
 +  * provide a central point of discovery for established URI scheme names and easy location of defining documents for schemes;
 +  * discourage multiple separate uses of the same scheme name;
 +  * help those proposing new scheme names to discern established trends and conventions and to avoid names that might be confused with existing ones; and
 +  * encourage registration by setting a low barrier for registration.
 +
 +/​**=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 +/* To add a discussion page to this page, comment out the line that says 
 +  ~~DISCUSSION:​off~~
 +*/
 +~~DISCUSSION:​on|Outstanding Issues~~
 +~~DISCUSSION:​off~~
  
dido/public/ra/xapend/xapend.b_stds/tech/ietf/7595.txt ยท Last modified: 2022/01/24 10:20 by nick