start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
start [2022/08/26 11:26] siyuan |
start [2022/12/19 14:58] (current) siyuan [GET INVOLVED] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Welcome to the Maths Special Interest Group (MathSIG) Wiki ====== | ====== Welcome to the Maths Special Interest Group (MathSIG) Wiki ====== | ||
| - | The Mathematical Formalism Domain Special Interest Group (or more simply, the MathSIG) was chartered in 2009 with an initial scope focused soley on the mathematical basis for model transformations that would enable system architects to compose higher level transformations more easily from lower level ones. This was motivated by the concepts of the OMG Model Driven Architecture TM which, at the time, were evolving and eventually led to MDA Guide Revision 2.0. Parallel to the evolution was advanced research on relational orientation as a candidate mathematical basis. Strongly influenced by the aerospace industry, a framework was proposed by liaison researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology. This was coined as the Relational Oriented Systems Engineering Technology Trade-off and Analysis framework (ROSETTA). | + | The Mathematical Formalism Domain Special Interest Group (or more simply, the MathSIG) was chartered in 2009 with an initial scope focused soley on the mathematical basis for model transformations that would enable system architects to compose higher level transformations more easily from lower level ones. This was motivated by the concepts of the OMG Model Driven Architecture® which, at the time, were evolving and eventually led to MDA Guide Revision 2.0. Parallel to the evolution was advanced research on relational orientation as a candidate mathematical basis. Strongly influenced by the aerospace industry, a framework was proposed by liaison researchers at the Georgia Institute of Technology. This was coined as the Relational Oriented Systems Engineering Technology Trade-off and Analysis framework (ROSETTA). |
| The collaboration with the aerospace industry expanded into the automotive industry in 2013 when a five year multi-university programme of research was launched in the United Kingdom by Jaguar Land Rover and the Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council aimed at simulation innovation and virtual prototyping. During the course of the programme, the ROSETTA framework evolved, matured, and moved closer to commercialisation. In 2018 the first OMG standard involving ROSETTA was adopted. Since then continued application to the electric vehicle market has led to further evolution of the concepts and methods of relational orientation that demand increasing levels of mathematical computation capabilities to be integrated into object-oriented model based systems engineering. This is the driving force behind the current focus of the MathSIG. The group has been re-organised and the mission statement has been streamlined for work not just on the mathematical basis for model transformations but also the foundational formalisms that underly MBSE and can be implemented in mathematically based tools using OMG standards. | The collaboration with the aerospace industry expanded into the automotive industry in 2013 when a five year multi-university programme of research was launched in the United Kingdom by Jaguar Land Rover and the Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council aimed at simulation innovation and virtual prototyping. During the course of the programme, the ROSETTA framework evolved, matured, and moved closer to commercialisation. In 2018 the first OMG standard involving ROSETTA was adopted. Since then continued application to the electric vehicle market has led to further evolution of the concepts and methods of relational orientation that demand increasing levels of mathematical computation capabilities to be integrated into object-oriented model based systems engineering. This is the driving force behind the current focus of the MathSIG. The group has been re-organised and the mission statement has been streamlined for work not just on the mathematical basis for model transformations but also the foundational formalisms that underly MBSE and can be implemented in mathematically based tools using OMG standards. | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| * September 2001 | * September 2001 | ||
| - "Update and Pathway for UPR 1.0 Evolution", //{{2021-09_presentation_to_mars.pptx}}// | - "Update and Pathway for UPR 1.0 Evolution", //{{2021-09_presentation_to_mars.pptx}}// | ||
| - | - | + | |
| A presentation will also be made to the Ontology PSIG in upcoming the September 2022 Quarterly meeting. | A presentation will also be made to the Ontology PSIG in upcoming the September 2022 Quarterly meeting. | ||
| ===== UPR 1.0 ===== | ===== UPR 1.0 ===== | ||
| - | ====UPR:UML Profile for ROSETTA==== | + | ====UPR: UML Profile for ROSETTA==== |
| UPR 1.0 was adopted through the RFC process. The UPR 1.0 RFC was issued in March 2018 and the standard was adopted in June 2018, published Janurary 2019. | UPR 1.0 was adopted through the RFC process. The UPR 1.0 RFC was issued in March 2018 and the standard was adopted in June 2018, published Janurary 2019. | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| Contact: Zahir Ismail, ZTI Systems Ltd | Contact: Zahir Ismail, ZTI Systems Ltd | ||
| Calder Court, Amy Johnson Way, Blackpool, FY4 2RH, UK | Calder Court, Amy Johnson Way, Blackpool, FY4 2RH, UK | ||
| - | |||
| - | ==== Contributors ==== | ||
| - | |||
| - | ^ Name ^ Organisation ^ Contact ^ | ||
| - | | Prof Charles Dickerson |Loughborough University |<[email protected]>| | ||
| - | | Dr Siyuan Ji | Loughborough University |<[email protected]>| | ||
| - | | Dr Mole Li | Loughborough University | <[email protected]> | | ||
| - | | Yves Bernad | Aribus | <[email protected]> | | ||
| - | | Dr David Mulvaney | Loughborough University | <[email protected]> | | ||
| - | | Peter Dennon | National Institute of Standards and Technology | <[email protected]> | | ||
| - | | Graham Bleakleyn | IBM | <[email protected]> | | ||
| - | | Dr Zhenyu Chen | Loughborough University | <[email protected]> | | ||
| - | |||
| ==== GET INVOLVED ==== | ==== GET INVOLVED ==== | ||
| Line 79: | Line 66: | ||
| Prof Charles Dickerson, Chair of the MathSig, <[email protected]> and | Prof Charles Dickerson, Chair of the MathSig, <[email protected]> and | ||
| Dr Siyuan Ji, <[email protected]> | Dr Siyuan Ji, <[email protected]> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Archive ===== | ||
start.1661527619.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/08/26 11:26 by siyuan
Page Tools
