User Tools

Site Tools


ocs:private:01.wp:bb:1.2_topics:3.how_build

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
ocs:private:01.wp:bb:1.2_topics:3.how_build [2021/09/19 14:04]
nick created
ocs:private:01.wp:bb:1.2_topics:3.how_build [2021/09/19 18:29] (current)
nick ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Topic 3: How do we build the civic business machine? ​ ====== ====== Topic 3: How do we build the civic business machine? ​ ======
 +[[ocs:​private:​01.wp:​bb:​1.2_topics:​start| Return to Topics]]
 +
  
 There are many different frameworks for developing effective enterprise There are many different frameworks for developing effective enterprise
 architecture (e.g., Zachman Framework, Open Group Architectural architecture (e.g., Zachman Framework, Open Group Architectural
-Framework, Federal Enterprise Architecture and the Gartner+Framework, Federal Enterprise Architectureand the Gartner
 Methodology);​ however, these frameworks should be viewed as strategic Methodology);​ however, these frameworks should be viewed as strategic
 management toolkits rather than roadmaps. The tools in the toolkits management toolkits rather than roadmaps. The tools in the toolkits
Line 10: Line 12:
  
 Participatory governance “seeks to deepen citizen participation in the Participatory governance “seeks to deepen citizen participation in the
-governmental process ​[(enterprise architecture)by examining the+governmental process (enterprise architecture) by examining the
 assumptions and practices of the traditional view that generally hinders… The traditional view of government service delivery is that government assumptions and practices of the traditional view that generally hinders… The traditional view of government service delivery is that government
-services must be delivered by government only. But when we look at the+services must be delivered by the government only. But when we look at the
 implications of this view, we see deficiencies in service delivery across implications of this view, we see deficiencies in service delivery across
 every level of government. These are deficiencies that are generally every level of government. These are deficiencies that are generally
Line 46: Line 48:
  
 **Public asset management** “is the discipline of sustaining public **Public asset management** “is the discipline of sustaining public
-infrastructure ​[(including data and digital assets),and facilities such as +infrastructure (including data and digital assets), and facilities such as 
-airports, bridges, waterways, ​[data centers, etc.]. Its goal is to optimize+airports, bridges, waterways, data centers, etc... Its goal is to optimize
 the service life of public assets to improve community quality of life and the service life of public assets to improve community quality of life and
 economic efficiency.” (( economic efficiency.” ((
Line 55: Line 57:
 Accessed February 28, 2020.  Accessed February 28, 2020. 
 [[https://​simplicable.com/​new/​publicasset-management]] [[https://​simplicable.com/​new/​publicasset-management]]
-)) +)) Within the practice of knowledge service
-Within the practice of knowledge service+
 development,​ communities of participation work in partnership with development,​ communities of participation work in partnership with
 government through participatory design to build awareness, add value to government through participatory design to build awareness, add value to
 data and digital assets, and to develop products and services that improve data and digital assets, and to develop products and services that improve
 quality of life.  quality of life. 
 +
 +In the same way that enterprise architecture is often misunderstood and
 +too narrowly defined, participatory design is often misunderstood to
 +mean a “design approach characterized by user involvement alone.”((
 +Johnson, Robert R. 
 +__User-Centered Technology: a Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts__,​
 +New York, 
 +NY: SUNY Press. ​
 +1998.
 +))
 +((
 +Spinuzzi, Clay.
 +__The Methodology of Participatory Design__,
 +Technical Communication, ​
 +2005.
 +[[https://​pdfs.semanticscholar.org/​3cbf/​8fd37d5502670f61ca06449f14df7a049a51.pdf]]
 +)). In
 +fact, it means the “various research methods… used to iteratively construct
 +the emerging [co-created] design.” ((
 +Spinuzzi, Clay.
 +__The Methodology of Participatory Design__,
 +Technical Communication, ​
 +2005.
 +[[https://​pdfs.semanticscholar.org/​3cbf/​8fd37d5502670f61ca06449f14df7a049a51.pdf]]
 +)).
 +
 +The participatory design process for knowledge services follows the stages
 +of knowledge service development:​ generate, transform, manage, use
 +internally, transfer, enhance, use professionally and evaluate (See Figure
 +1). Each stage represents research and the development of knowledge that
 +feeds the next iteration of the process. Consider for a moment, the
 +economic and social effects of combining participatory governance and
 +public asset management through a business model that further structures
 +the participatory design process (research and development) to result in
 +return on investment for government organizations and private-sector
 +partners.
  
 /​**=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- /​**=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
ocs/private/01.wp/bb/1.2_topics/3.how_build.1632074663.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/09/19 14:04 by nick