cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:start [2022/03/14 19:23] nick created |
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:start [2022/06/17 17:24] (current) terrance |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== II. Document ====== | + | ====== II. Main Document ====== |
| - | + | |< 100% >| | |
| + | | [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:start| OMG Responses to Federal Reserve Discussion Paper]] | <WRAP> | ||
| + | <html><b> | ||
| + | <a href="mailto:[email protected]?Subject=OMG's CBDC WG Response: | ||
| + | II. Main Document | ||
| + | ">Provide Feedback</a></b> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
| + | </WRAP> | | ||
| + | <table content> | ||
| + | <caption>A summary of the Sections in the OMG's CBDC WG Response</caption> | ||
| + | |< 100% 15% >| | ||
| + | ^ [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:04_intro:start| 1.0 Introduction]] | <WRAP> | ||
| + | A brief introduction into the problem space, The Federal Reserve and the **White Paper** and the Object Management Group. | ||
| + | </WRAP>| | ||
| + | ^ [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:08_method:start| 2.0 Methodology]]| <WRAP> | ||
| + | A brief overview of the methodology the OMG's CBDC WG used to formulate a response to the **White Paper**. | ||
| + | </WRAP>| | ||
| + | ^ [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:12_summary:start| 3.0 White Paper Analysis]]| <WRAP> | ||
| + | A breakdown of the **White Paper** discussion of a U.S. CBDC and the Desirements(( | ||
| + | **Desirement** is a blended word combining the word **Desire** and **Requirement**. **Desirement** is something that is desired, but not absolutely required and is often used to caption the capabilities of a product or system before it has reached the formal requirements phase. | ||
| + | Source: [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:d:desirement | Desirement]] | ||
| + | )) for that effort. Each Desirement is identified as to the page it was found on, its classification as a Benefit, Policy, Risks, Design, and a brief actionable statement. | ||
| + | </WRAP>| | ||
| + | ^ [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:15_common:start| 4.0 Common Elements]]| <WRAP> | ||
| + | During the review of the 22 questions posed in the **White Paper** it was decided that there were some common elements that needed to be separately addressed in order to not repeat the same information in the response to multiple questions. | ||
| + | </WRAP>| | ||
| + | ^ [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:20_comments:start| 5.0 Questions and Responses]]| <WRAP> | ||
| + | The actual OMG response to the 22 direct questions posed in the **White Paper**. These are linked to other sections of the OMG's CBDC WG response such as the **Common Elements** and also other questions. The OMG's CBDC WG responded to all the questions, however, a few were felt to be beyond the scope of what the OMG's CBDC WG members could respond to. | ||
| + | </WRAP>| | ||
| + | ^ [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:04_doc:90_recommend:start| 6.0 Recommendations ]]| <WRAP> | ||
| + | The OMG's CBDC WG members wanted to make recommendations to the Federal Reserve for future activities in the area of a U.S. CBDC. They propose 12 different direct actions or activities. One of these activities involves the use of RDT&E funding to explore eight specific Research Development Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) topics. | ||
| + | </WRAP>| | ||
| + | </table> | ||
cbdc/public/cbdc_omg/04_doc/start.1647300208.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/03/14 19:23 by nick
