cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:50_other:start
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:50_other:start [2022/05/16 18:18] nick ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation |
cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:50_other:start [2022/06/17 21:56] (current) terrance |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Appendix C: Other Transaction Authority (OTA) ====== | ====== Appendix C: Other Transaction Authority (OTA) ====== | ||
| - | [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:start| OMG Responses to Federal Reserve Discussion Paper]] | + | |< 100% >| |
| + | | [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:start | Return to Appendices]] | <WRAP> | ||
| + | <html><b> | ||
| + | <a href="mailto:[email protected]?Subject=OMG's CBDC WG Response: | ||
| + | Appendix C: Other Transaction Authority (OTA) | ||
| + | ">Provide Feedback</a></b> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
| + | </WRAP> | | ||
| ===== Overview ===== | ===== Overview ===== | ||
| - | [[cbdc:public:8_append:50_other:start| Return to Top]] | + | [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:50_other:start| Return to Top]] |
| **Other Transaction Authority (OTA)** is the authority of a US Agency to use [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:o:other_transactions | Other Transactions (OTs)]]. Once the agency has OTA, it can establish an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) | **Other Transaction Authority (OTA)** is the authority of a US Agency to use [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:o:other_transactions | Other Transactions (OTs)]]. Once the agency has OTA, it can establish an Other Transaction Agreement (OTA) | ||
| Line 87: | Line 95: | ||
| ===== Recommendations ===== | ===== Recommendations ===== | ||
| - | [[cbdc:public:8_append:50_other:start| Return to Top]] | + | [[cbdc:public:cbdc_omg:8_append:50_other:start| Return to Top]] |
| - | The [[https://www.omg.org/ | Object Management Group ]] recommends the US Federal Reserve continues to pursue **''P0011''** and **''P0030''** but as two separate issues. It is essential the Federal Reserve pursues a CBDC (i.e., **''P0011''**) and makes recommendations based on using [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.2_views:3_taxonomic:4_data_tax:01_cog_taxonomy:start | Data, Information, Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom]] gathered during the RTD&E efforts (i.e., **''P0030''**). CBDC is a large problem with many moving parts, all of which require a lot of systems analysis, engineering, and simulation in order to ensure public confidence: | + | The [[https://www.omg.org/ | Object Management Group's ]] CBDC WG recommends the US Federal Reserve continues to pursue **''P0011''** and **''P0030''** but as two separate issues. It is essential the Federal Reserve pursues a CBDC (i.e., **''P0011''**) and makes recommendations based on using [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.2_views:3_taxonomic:4_data_tax:01_cog_taxonomy:start | Data, Information, Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom]] gathered during the RTD&E efforts (i.e., **''P0030''**). CBDC is a large problem with many moving parts, all of which require a lot of systems analysis, engineering, and simulation in order to ensure public confidence: |
| : //For a nation’s economy to function effectively, its citizens must have confidence in its money and payment services. The Federal Reserve, as the nation’s central bank, works to maintain the public’s confidence by fostering monetary stability, financial stability, and a safe and efficient payment system. // from the **Executive Summary** provided in the [[https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/money-and-payments-20220120.pdf | Money, and Payments: The U.S. Dollar in the Age of Digital Transformation]] White Paper | : //For a nation’s economy to function effectively, its citizens must have confidence in its money and payment services. The Federal Reserve, as the nation’s central bank, works to maintain the public’s confidence by fostering monetary stability, financial stability, and a safe and efficient payment system. // from the **Executive Summary** provided in the [[https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/files/money-and-payments-20220120.pdf | Money, and Payments: The U.S. Dollar in the Age of Digital Transformation]] White Paper | ||
| Line 95: | Line 103: | ||
| Pursuing a CBDC that is flawed could ultimately inflict more damage than it is worth. | Pursuing a CBDC that is flawed could ultimately inflict more damage than it is worth. | ||
| - | After the Federal Reserve obtains OT Authority, the OMG further recommends that an **Other Transaction (OT) Consortium** be established. An OT Consortium is a formal relationship between a government sponsor (i.e., Federal Reserve) and a collection of traditional and non-traditional vendors, non-profit organizations, and academia aligned to a technology domain area (i.e., cyber, space, undersea, propulsion) that are managed by a single entity, and focused on innovative solutions to government technology challenges that meet the intended scope and purpose of other transactions. | + | After the Federal Reserve obtains OT Authority, the OMG's CBDC WG further recommends that an **Other Transaction (OT) Consortium** be established. An OT Consortium is a formal relationship between a government sponsor (i.e., Federal Reserve) and a collection of traditional and non-traditional vendors, non-profit organizations, and academia aligned to a technology domain area (i.e., cyber, space, undersea, propulsion) that are managed by a single entity, and focused on innovative solutions to government technology challenges that meet the intended scope and purpose of other transactions. |
| OT Consortium is based on the following [[https://aida.mitre.org/demystifying-dod/ots-otconsortia/ | OT Consortium Model]]: | OT Consortium is based on the following [[https://aida.mitre.org/demystifying-dod/ots-otconsortia/ | OT Consortium Model]]: | ||
| <figure consortium> | <figure consortium> | ||
| - | {{ cbdc:private:cbdc_omg:04_doc:20_comments:brp:q01:screen_shot_2022-02-27_at_1.26.52_pm.png?600 |}} | + | {{ cbdc:04_doc:20_comments:brp:q01:screen_shot_2022-02-27_at_1.26.52_pm.png?600 |}} |
| <caption>The Existing OT Constoria Model</caption> | <caption>The Existing OT Constoria Model</caption> | ||
| </figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 109: | Line 117: | ||
| * Consortium Manager | * Consortium Manager | ||
| * Consortium (i.e., Stakeholders) | * Consortium (i.e., Stakeholders) | ||
| - | : **Note:** Sometimes the government sponsors prefer to manage a consortium in-house rather than hire an industry Consortium Manager or Consortium Management Firm. | + | : **Note:** Sometimes, the government sponsors prefer to manage a consortium in-house rather than hire an industry Consortium Manager or Consortium Management Firm. |
| - | The Consortium Manager is awarded an OT agreement by the government (base OT agreement) and manages OTs awarded to its consortium member organizations (project OT agreements) under the base agreement. In the [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra | OMG Distributed Immutable Data Object Reference Architecture (DIDO-RA)]], this highest level (i.e., OT Consortium) is referred to as the [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.2_views:1_stakeholder:4_ecosphere | Ecosphere]] which would roughly follow the steps outlined in [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.3_gov:1_communities:2_stakeholder | Steps for Establishing an Ecosphere]]. Also see [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.3_gov:1_legaldocs | DIDO-RA on Legal Documents]] for a discussion of how Ecosphere, Ecosystem, and Domain are related. The overall intent is that the Ecosphere has the responsibility to external entities (i.e., sponsors). The OT Consortia (ie., Ecosphere) can create any number of Ecosystems and Domains as is needed. It is recommended that the Ecosystems create and are responsible for Domains that fall under their auspices, however, the Policy and Procedures (P&P) may require the Ecosphere's approval for creation. | + | The Consortium Manager is awarded an OT agreement by the government (base OT agreement) and manages OTs awarded to its consortium member organizations (project OT agreements) under the base agreement. In the [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra | OMG Distributed Immutable Data Object Reference Architecture (DIDO-RA)]], this highest level (i.e., OT Consortium) is referred to as the [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.2_views:1_stakeholder:4_ecosphere | Ecosphere]] which would roughly follow the steps outlined in [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.3_gov:1_communities:2_stakeholder | Steps for Establishing an Ecosphere]]. Also see [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.3_gov:1_legaldocs | DIDO-RA on Legal Documents]] for a discussion of how Ecosphere, Ecosystem, and Domain are related. The overall intent is the Ecosphere has the responsibility to external entities (i.e., sponsors). The OT Consortia (i.e., Ecosphere) can create any number of Ecosystems and Domains as is needed. It is recommended that the Ecosystems create and are responsible for Domains that fall under their auspices; however, the Policy and Procedures (P&P) may require the Ecosphere's approval for creation. |
| - | Table {{ref>LegalDocs}} summarizes the relationship between the Ecosphere, Ecosystem, and Domains. Some P&P may require every Ecosystem and Domain to have their own sub-charter which a narrower scope than the Ecosphere. See [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.3_gov:1_legaldocs | OMG DIDO-RA, 3.2 Legal Documents]] | + | Table {{ref>LegalDocs}} summarizes the relationship between the Ecosphere, Ecosystem, and Domains. Some P&P may require every Ecosystem and Domain to have its own sub-charter which a narrower scope than the Ecosphere. See [[https://www.omgwiki.org/dido/doku.php?id=dido:public:ra:1.3_gov:1_legaldocs | OMG DIDO-RA, 3.2 Legal Documents]] |
| <table LegalDocs> | <table LegalDocs> | ||
| Line 138: | Line 146: | ||
| )) | )) | ||
| - | : //OTAs are binding agreements between Defense Department organizations and industry partners that are different than Federal Acquisition Regulation contracts, grants and cooperative agreements. While they are an innovative and flexible option that is not subject to all acquisition laws and regulations, they require vigorous program management.// | + | : //OTAs are binding agreements between Defense Department organizations and industry partners that are different than Federal Acquisition Regulation contracts, grants, and cooperative agreements. While they are an innovative and flexible option that is not subject to all acquisition laws and regulations, they require vigorous program management.// |
| : //The intent of OTAs is to leverage commercial technologies for military purposes, improve the nation’s industrial base and allow for more cost-effective and affordable solutions without extreme bureaucracy. Opportunities are available to traditional defense industry partners and nontraditional defense contractors, such as academia, non-profits, and other small businesses.// | : //The intent of OTAs is to leverage commercial technologies for military purposes, improve the nation’s industrial base and allow for more cost-effective and affordable solutions without extreme bureaucracy. Opportunities are available to traditional defense industry partners and nontraditional defense contractors, such as academia, non-profits, and other small businesses.// | ||
| : //Failing to plan is planning to fail. Since parties can negotiate and tailor many OTA elements, it is critical for all parties involved to complete sound planning efforts prior to execution. Also, because they promote “outside the box” business practices, risk management is not a choice, but the backbone of the effort from cradle to grave. Agencies should start planning with a clear needs statement or defined problem supporting a capability gap.// | : //Failing to plan is planning to fail. Since parties can negotiate and tailor many OTA elements, it is critical for all parties involved to complete sound planning efforts prior to execution. Also, because they promote “outside the box” business practices, risk management is not a choice, but the backbone of the effort from cradle to grave. Agencies should start planning with a clear needs statement or defined problem supporting a capability gap.// | ||
| Line 150: | Line 158: | ||
| ^ [[https://www.ncms.org/ammp/ | Advanced Manufacturing, Materials, and Processes (AMMP)]] | NCMS | Advance and enable additive manufacturing to create next-generation manufacturing breakthroughs| | ^ [[https://www.ncms.org/ammp/ | Advanced Manufacturing, Materials, and Processes (AMMP)]] | NCMS | Advance and enable additive manufacturing to create next-generation manufacturing breakthroughs| | ||
| ^ [[https://amc.ati.org/ | American Metalcasting Consortium (AMC)]] | ATI | An industry-led consortium developing new technologies and processes that support the DLA in the procurement of critical cast parts.| | ^ [[https://amc.ati.org/ | American Metalcasting Consortium (AMC)]] | ATI | An industry-led consortium developing new technologies and processes that support the DLA in the procurement of critical cast parts.| | ||
| - | ^ [[https://www.amrdec.army.mil/amrdec/ | Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC)]] | US Army Contracting Command | The development and maturation of guided-missile technologies, manufacturing and enabling/disruptive technologies, and aviation technologies.| | + | ^ [[https://www.amrdec.army.mil/amrdec/ | Aviation and Missile Research, Development and Engineering Center (AMRDEC)]] | US Army Contracting Command | The development and maturation of guided-missile technologies, manufacturing, and enabling/disruptive technologies, and aviation technologies.| |
| ^ [[https://www.amrdec.army.mil/amrdec/ | Aviation and Missile Technology Consortium (AMTC)]] | ATI | Develop and transition Army aviation and missile manufacturing technologies, and integrate advanced technologies, techniques and processes into future effective weapon systems.| | ^ [[https://www.amrdec.army.mil/amrdec/ | Aviation and Missile Technology Consortium (AMTC)]] | ATI | Develop and transition Army aviation and missile manufacturing technologies, and integrate advanced technologies, techniques and processes into future effective weapon systems.| | ||
| ^ [[https://bstc.ati.org/ | Border Security Technology Consortium (BSTC)]] | ATI | Research, development, prototyping, and piloting initiatives to meet border security requirements and close capability gaps.| | ^ [[https://bstc.ati.org/ | Border Security Technology Consortium (BSTC)]] | ATI | Research, development, prototyping, and piloting initiatives to meet border security requirements and close capability gaps.| | ||
| Line 162: | Line 170: | ||
| ^ [[http://www.cyberapexsolutions.com/ | Cyber Apex Solutions Consortium]] | Cyber Apex Solutions, LLC | Applied cybersecurity research focused on filling the security gaps of critical infrastructure in the United States of America.| | ^ [[http://www.cyberapexsolutions.com/ | Cyber Apex Solutions Consortium]] | Cyber Apex Solutions, LLC | Applied cybersecurity research focused on filling the security gaps of critical infrastructure in the United States of America.| | ||
| ^ [[http://datc.saeitc.org/ | Defense Automotive Technologies Consortium (DATC)]] | SAE International | Develop and transition advanced automotive technologies to all branches of military and government agencies.| | ^ [[http://datc.saeitc.org/ | Defense Automotive Technologies Consortium (DATC)]] | SAE International | Develop and transition advanced automotive technologies to all branches of military and government agencies.| | ||
| - | ^ [[http://www.nac-dotc.org/about_dotc.html | Department of Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium (DOTC)]] | ATI | Integrate the DoD Ordnance community to work collaboratively in RDT&E of prototype solutions to advance and transition ordnance systems, subsystems, and component technologies.| | + | ^ [[http://www.nac-dotc.org/about_dotc.html | Department of Defense Ordnance Technology Consortium (DOTC)]] | ATI | Integrate the DoD Ordnance community to work collaboratively in RDT&E of prototype solutions to the advance and transition ordnance systems, subsystems, and component technologies.| |
| ^ [[http://fdmc.ati.org/ | Forging Defense Manufacturing Consortium (FDMC)]] | ATI | Teaming the US forging industry with the DoD to address supply chain challenges and research needs.| | ^ [[http://fdmc.ati.org/ | Forging Defense Manufacturing Consortium (FDMC)]] | ATI | Teaming the US forging industry with the DoD to address supply chain challenges and research needs.| | ||
| ^ [[http://www.theiwrp.org/ | Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP)]] | ATI | Developing and implementing advanced Information Warfare technology solutions.| | ^ [[http://www.theiwrp.org/ | Information Warfare Research Project (IWRP)]] | ATI | Developing and implementing advanced Information Warfare technology solutions.| | ||
| Line 179: | Line 187: | ||
| ^ [[https://www.sossecinc.com/scec/scec-home/ | Sensors, Communications, and Electronics Consortium (SCEC) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Conduct research, development, and testing in cooperation with the Government, leading to technology demonstrations and prototype projects in the sensors, communications, and electronics sciences and other related fields.| | ^ [[https://www.sossecinc.com/scec/scec-home/ | Sensors, Communications, and Electronics Consortium (SCEC) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Conduct research, development, and testing in cooperation with the Government, leading to technology demonstrations and prototype projects in the sensors, communications, and electronics sciences and other related fields.| | ||
| ^ [[http://www.space-enterprise-consortium.org/ | Space Enterprise Consortium® (SpEC) ]] | ATI | Reducing risk and increasing constellation refresh rates to improve the availability of new technology on-orbit and to enhance system responsiveness and survivability.| | ^ [[http://www.space-enterprise-consortium.org/ | Space Enterprise Consortium® (SpEC) ]] | ATI | Reducing risk and increasing constellation refresh rates to improve the availability of new technology on-orbit and to enhance system responsiveness and survivability.| | ||
| - | ^ [[https://www.sossecinc.com/ | System of Systems Consortium (SOSSEC) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Technology agnostic approaches that capture the best of breed solutions.| | + | ^ [[https://www.sossecinc.com/ | System of Systems Consortium (SOSSEC) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Technology agnostic approaches that capture the best-of-breed solutions.| |
| ^ [[https://s2marts.org/ | Strategic & Spectrum Missions Advanced Resilient Trusted Systems ((S2MARTS )) ]] | NSTXL | The S2MARTS OTA (pronounced “SMARTS”) is designed to refine strategies, management planning activities, and implement integrated, complementary solutions that enable broader Department of Defense (DoD) access to commercial state-of-the-art EMS technologies, advanced microelectronics, radiation-hardened (RAD-HARD) and strategic missions hardware.| | ^ [[https://s2marts.org/ | Strategic & Spectrum Missions Advanced Resilient Trusted Systems ((S2MARTS )) ]] | NSTXL | The S2MARTS OTA (pronounced “SMARTS”) is designed to refine strategies, management planning activities, and implement integrated, complementary solutions that enable broader Department of Defense (DoD) access to commercial state-of-the-art EMS technologies, advanced microelectronics, radiation-hardened (RAD-HARD) and strategic missions hardware.| | ||
| ^ [[https://trainingaccelerator.org/team/ | Training and Readiness Accelerator (TReX) ]] | NSTXL | To expedite the development, demonstration, and delivery of cutting edge technology capabilities in support of modeling, simulation, and training (MST) needs of the U.S. Department of Defense.| | ^ [[https://trainingaccelerator.org/team/ | Training and Readiness Accelerator (TReX) ]] | NSTXL | To expedite the development, demonstration, and delivery of cutting edge technology capabilities in support of modeling, simulation, and training (MST) needs of the U.S. Department of Defense.| | ||
| ^ [[http://www.underseatech.org/ | Undersea Technology Innovation Consortium (UTIC) ]] | ATI | Rapid development, prototyping, and commercialization of innovative undersea and maritime technology.| | ^ [[http://www.underseatech.org/ | Undersea Technology Innovation Consortium (UTIC) ]] | ATI | Rapid development, prototyping, and commercialization of innovative undersea and maritime technology.| | ||
| ^ [[http://www.verticalliftconsortium.org/ | Vertical Lift Consortium (VLC) ]] | ATI | Develop and transition innovative vertical lift technologies to meet Warfighter needs.| | ^ [[http://www.verticalliftconsortium.org/ | Vertical Lift Consortium (VLC) ]] | ATI | Develop and transition innovative vertical lift technologies to meet Warfighter needs.| | ||
| - | ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | AFLCMC Consortium Initiative (ACI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Prototyping projects might include any topic generally consistent with the research, development, test, and evaluation within prototyping projects of the AFLCMC mission sets.| | + | ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | AFLCMC Consortium Initiative (ACI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Prototyping projects might include any topic generally consistent with the research, development, test, and evaluation of within prototyping projects of the AFLCMC mission sets.| |
| ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Cyberspace Operations Broad Responsive Agreement (COBRA) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Establish defense-in-depth across the entirety of cyberspace by simultaneously combining DCO capabilities at global, regional and local levels using a layered and adaptive approach.| | ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Cyberspace Operations Broad Responsive Agreement (COBRA) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Establish defense-in-depth across the entirety of cyberspace by simultaneously combining DCO capabilities at global, regional and local levels using a layered and adaptive approach.| | ||
| ^ [[https://www.deconsortium.org/ | Defense Electronics Consortium (DEC) ]] | USPAE | The DEC identifies challenges, needs, and opportunities in defense electronics, which has been impacted by the contraction of U.S. electronics manufacturing and other factors.| | ^ [[https://www.deconsortium.org/ | Defense Electronics Consortium (DEC) ]] | USPAE | The DEC identifies challenges, needs, and opportunities in defense electronics, which has been impacted by the contraction of U.S. electronics manufacturing and other factors.| | ||
| Line 201: | Line 209: | ||
| ^ [[https://nssc.berkeley.edu/ | Nuclear Science and Security Consortium (NSSC)]] | NNSA | Develop a new generation of laboratory-integrated nuclear experts.| | ^ [[https://nssc.berkeley.edu/ | Nuclear Science and Security Consortium (NSSC)]] | NNSA | Develop a new generation of laboratory-integrated nuclear experts.| | ||
| ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Open System Acquisition Initiative (OSAI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Produce prototypes in command, control, communications, and cyber, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) that increase the efficiency of Government, industry and academia capabilities in information systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense (DOD), and to reduce the cost of defense information systems technology.| | ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Open System Acquisition Initiative (OSAI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Produce prototypes in command, control, communications, and cyber, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (C4ISR) that increase the efficiency of Government, industry and academia capabilities in information systems proposed to be acquired or developed by the Department of Defense (DOD), and to reduce the cost of defense information systems technology.| | ||
| - | ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Propulsion Directorate Consortium Initiative (PCI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Perform critical research, development, test, and evaluation within prototyping projects addressing propulsion needs and the future of the propulsion enterprise.| | + | ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Propulsion Directorate Consortium Initiative (PCI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Perform critical research, development, testing, and evaluation within prototyping projects addressing propulsion needs and the future of the propulsion enterprise.| |
| ^ [[https://www.opengroup.org/sosa | Sensor Open Systems Architecture (SOSA Consortium) ]] | SOSA | The SOSA Consortium is creating open system reference architectures applicable to military and commercial sensor systems and a business model that balances stakeholder interests.| | ^ [[https://www.opengroup.org/sosa | Sensor Open Systems Architecture (SOSA Consortium) ]] | SOSA | The SOSA Consortium is creating open system reference architectures applicable to military and commercial sensor systems and a business model that balances stakeholder interests.| | ||
| ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Supply Chain Consortium Initiative (SCCI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Perform critical research, development, test, and evaluation within prototyping projects addressing 448th Supply Chain Management Wing (SCMW), to include other organizations in the Air Force Material Command (AFMC) or strategic partners, needs and the future of these enterprises.| | ^ [[https://sossecinc.com/sossecconsortium/ | Supply Chain Consortium Initiative (SCCI) ]] | SOSSEC Inc. | Perform critical research, development, test, and evaluation within prototyping projects addressing 448th Supply Chain Management Wing (SCMW), to include other organizations in the Air Force Material Command (AFMC) or strategic partners, needs and the future of these enterprises.| | ||
cbdc/public/cbdc_omg/8_append/50_other/start.1652739517.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/05/16 18:18 by nick
