dido:public:ra:1.2_views:3_taxonomic:1_topologies:1_centralized
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
dido:public:ra:1.2_views:3_taxonomic:1_topologies:1_centralized [2021/08/11 11:27] murphy |
dido:public:ra:1.2_views:3_taxonomic:1_topologies:1_centralized [2022/05/27 20:17] (current) nick grammar |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== 2.3.1.1 Centralized Network Topology ====== | ====== 2.3.1.1 Centralized Network Topology ====== | ||
| - | [[dido:public:ra:1.2_views:3_taxonomic:1_topologies|return to Network Topology Taxonomy]] | + | [[dido:public:ra:1.2_views:3_taxonomic:1_topologies:start|return to Network Topology Taxonomy]] |
| - | The centralized [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:n:nettopo|network topology]] (usually associated with mainframes) has a very large centralized server [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:n:node|node]] that all other nodes connect to. It provides most of the services such as data storage, processing, backups, and computational power for the other nodes. It is possible to implement a “[[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:l:ledger|ledger]]” using the centralized model. In many ways, the centralized model that holds a single ledger is easier to implement and maintain since there is only one version of the data in one place and consequently, by definition, the data is the canonical data (i.e., authoritative or standard data). | + | The centralized [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:n:nettopo|network topology]] (usually associated with mainframes) has a very large centralized [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:s:server|server]] [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:n:node|node]] that all other nodes connect to. It provides most of the services such as data storage, processing, backups, and computational power for the other nodes. It is possible to implement a “[[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:l:ledger|ledger]]” using the centralized model. In many ways, the centralized model that holds a single ledger is easier to implement and maintain since there is only one version of the data in one place and consequently, by definition, the data is the canonical data (i.e., authoritative or standard data). |
| <figure> | <figure> | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| </figure> | </figure> | ||
| - | Trying to remove redundant, replicated, or duplicate data is a fundamental principle of the centralized model. The multiple “copy of data” problem was first formally addressed by E. F. Codd in his development of A Relational Model of Data for Large Shared Data Banks(( E. F. Codd, | + | Trying to remove redundant, replicated, or duplicate data is a fundamental [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:p:principle|principle]] of the centralized model. The multiple “copy of data” problem was first formally addressed by E. F. Codd in his development of A [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:r:relational_model|Relational Model]] of Data for Large Shared Data Banks(( E. F. Codd, |
| "A relational model of data for large shared data banks," | "A relational model of data for large shared data banks," | ||
| Communications of the ACM, vol. 13, n. 6, pp. 377-387, June 1970 | Communications of the ACM, vol. 13, n. 6, pp. 377-387, June 1970 | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| ((G2 Crowd, "Best Relational Databases Software in 2018," 2018. [Online]. Available: [[ https://www.g2crowd.com/categories/relational-databases]] [Accessed 12 June 2018]. | ((G2 Crowd, "Best Relational Databases Software in 2018," 2018. [Online]. Available: [[ https://www.g2crowd.com/categories/relational-databases]] [Accessed 12 June 2018]. | ||
| )) | )) | ||
| - | . The following chart shows that the centralized database market is not shrinking, and by 2017 had grown to a net worth of $50 billion with no signs of change in this growth trend. | + | . The following chart shows that the centralized database market is not shrinking, and by 2017 had grown to a net worth of $50 billion with no signs of change in this growing trend. |
| (( A. Shields, "Is Oracle's Position Secure in the Database Space?," 18 January 2016. [Online]. Available: [[http://marketrealist.com/2016/01/oracles-position-secure-database-space/]]. [Accessed 22 July 2017]. | (( A. Shields, "Is Oracle's Position Secure in the Database Space?," 18 January 2016. [Online]. Available: [[http://marketrealist.com/2016/01/oracles-position-secure-database-space/]]. [Accessed 22 July 2017]. | ||
| )) | )) | ||
dido/public/ra/1.2_views/3_taxonomic/1_topologies/1_centralized.1628695677.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/08/11 11:27 by murphy
