dido:public:ra:1.4_req:00_aboutreq:05_currstate
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
dido:public:ra:1.4_req:00_aboutreq:05_currstate [2021/03/06 00:04] nick |
dido:public:ra:1.4_req:00_aboutreq:05_currstate [2022/04/22 18:45] (current) nick |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== 4.5 The Current State of DIDO Requirements ====== | + | ====== 4.1.5 The Current State of DIDO Requirements ====== |
| - | [[dido:public:ra:1.4_req | Return to Requirements]] | + | [[dido:public:ra:1.4_req:00_aboutreq | Return to About Requirements]] |
| The current state of DIDO governance is basically "Execution Centric". This basically means that the governance is being developed by those that are actually creating the DIDO platforms (i.e., products). Although this approach may seem efficient as a way to overcome bureaucratic obstacles, it ultimately leads to failures in the end results. In Figure {{ref>currCombReq}}, the **Execution** is represented as a pyramid. This represents the bottom up approach used to developed most DIDO platforms today and is a reflection of the [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:a:agile]] Agile methodology popular on [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:m:missioncritical | non-Mission Critical Systems]]. | The current state of DIDO governance is basically "Execution Centric". This basically means that the governance is being developed by those that are actually creating the DIDO platforms (i.e., products). Although this approach may seem efficient as a way to overcome bureaucratic obstacles, it ultimately leads to failures in the end results. In Figure {{ref>currCombReq}}, the **Execution** is represented as a pyramid. This represents the bottom up approach used to developed most DIDO platforms today and is a reflection of the [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:a:agile]] Agile methodology popular on [[dido:public:ra:xapend:xapend.a_glossary:m:missioncritical | non-Mission Critical Systems]]. | ||
| - | As cryptocurrencies attempt to become financial instruments and represent actual national currencies, they are essentially positioning themselves as Mission Critical for the nations, their economies and their citizens. Therefore, to be successful, they must be governed properly which implies that each Role (i.e., cell) within the combined Governing and Cognitive models (See Figure {{ref>combReq}}) need to have an Actor (i.e. be completed). | + | As cryptocurrencies attempt to become financial instruments and represent actual national currencies, they are essentially positioning themselves as Mission Critical for the nations, their economies and their citizens. Therefore, to be successful, they must be governed properly which implies that each Role (i.e., cell) within the combined [[dido:public:ra:1.4_req:00_aboutreq:03_combreqmdl | Governing and Cognitive models]] (See Figure {{ref>currCombReq}}) need to have an Actor (i.e. be completed). |
| <figure currCombReq> | <figure currCombReq> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| </figure> | </figure> | ||
| - | This is not unusual when a new disruptive product or service comes along, it is to be expected. However, in order to mature to the next level and gain wider acceptance, the product or service needs to mature its governance. The Combined __Governing and Cognitive Model__ depicted in Figure {{ref>combReq}} offers a good framework that can act as a checklist of what is done and what needs to be done. | + | This is not unusual when a new disruptive product or service comes along, it is to be expected. However, in order to mature to the next level and gain wider acceptance, the product or service needs to mature its governance. The Combined __Governing and Cognitive Model__ described and depicted in [[dido:public:ra:1.4_req:00_aboutreq:03_combreqmdl |Section 4.1.3]] offers a good framework for a checklist of what is done and what needs to be done. |
| The relationship between the Roles (i.e., cells) in a many-to-many relationship that is not only bidirectional in up and down the cognitive layers but also between the governance aspects. | The relationship between the Roles (i.e., cells) in a many-to-many relationship that is not only bidirectional in up and down the cognitive layers but also between the governance aspects. | ||
dido/public/ra/1.4_req/00_aboutreq/05_currstate.1615007049.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/03/06 00:04 by nick
