(or whatever we end up calling it)
Example:
Term origin, definition, definition adapted from etc.
Things about items in the Resource i.e. things about definition, things about acronym etc.
Stuff that is not part of the relationships among these things.
That is, this is not a complete list of things in the resource.
Like: OWL Annotation Properties as distinct from OWL Object Properties or OWL Datatype Properties.
Future work: We need to fine tune this once we have looked at the examples and edge cases in this wish list. Would this change from WG to WG? Without the clarity we just identified the need for, we don’t know yet. Ideally we want something that TFs and SIGs can easily digest.
Desired annotations for 3 things:
Some of the annotations for (1) and (2) may be the same.
Separately, some of the information to be retained (2) will be cross-references to (1) or (3) but these are not strictly annotations so not included here.
Stuff we have done so far to tease out these requirements:
Experiment One:
Synonym(s)
Acronym
Origin
Broader Than
Narrower Than
Relationships
Origin
URI
Explanatory Note
Blockchain PSIG Terms and Definitions
Sourced Definition (Original definition at source)
Adapted Definition
Kinds of Adapted – do we need to distinguish these?
Adapted Definition – edited for grammar only
Adapted definition – cut down
Adapted From
Reasons for adaptation?
Definition Origin (see also FIBO)
Definition Origin (as URI)
Definition Origin (as publisher)
Definition origin (as Reference i.e. paper, author, publisher, date) = link to References content
Definition origin (as term in a source model e.g. message model, UML model or ontology)
Source URI
See SKOS Notes extensions and FIBO AV extensions to SKOS note
See separate Word document (not yet expanded upon here)