OMG-EDMC Joint Working Group

Semantic Models for Financial Reform

In response to the 2007-09 financial crisis, the U.S. congress passed the Dodd Frank Act. Financial institutions will need to implement data standards such as instrument and business entity identifiers, associated reference data and hierarchies to support the reporting requirements in a manner that facilitates analytics and supports systemic oversight.

The purpose of the joint EDMC-OMG Working group is to accelerate the development of a 'sustainable, data standards and model driven' approach to regulatory compliance. Please note that support for financial reform standards is an important application of (but not limited to) the proposed joint standard. Stakeholders from Object Management Group and EDM Council (in collaboration with other standards organizations) are contributing to the development of these standards. Initial scope is to develop and adoptof the semantic standard for both financial instruments and legal entities. This Wiki will serve as a single point of reference for working group artifacts except the vocabulary and models that will be managed in a metadata repository (details to be announced).

Latest Monthly Update

  • SMART Regulation Use Cases update May 2013

Draft Specfication Documents

Latest - May / June for Berlin (with errata)

May 20 version as submitted for Berlin

March 2013 Baseline as seen in Reston

These documents will also be available on the OMG server.

Workstreams

There are no active workstreams at the present time.

Latest Notes

Recent Notes

  • Recent Monthly update November 2012 with more details of technical work.

In general, the first session (2 - 3 Eastern US Time) focuses on business-facing matters and documentation, while technical and metamodeling considerations are the focus of the second (3 - 4 Eastern) sessions.

We will re-start these Workstream sessions on Thursday 6 September. Work we have lined up to do includes:

  • Scoping for FIBO-BE
  • Convenience specification - changes as agreed in Conformance section; other OMG comments.
  • Operationalizing ontologies - how to derive suitable RDF/OWL ontologies for specific applications, on a per use case basis; also what if anything is the difference between the overall FIBO conceptual model standards (as agreed by business) and the RDF/OWL deliverable standards material.

The links below are to the home pages of previous and current workstreams, where you can find the notes from those sessions:

Deliverables

Draft RFC Specification

  • June 2012 Convenience Documents
  • finance/12-06-01FIBO Foundations (replaces the earlier model content section with one generated from Adaptive)
  • finance/12-06-02FIBO Business Entities (replaces the earlier model content section with one generated from Adaptive)

Earlier Drafts

  • DRAFTS AS SUBMITTED prior to the June OMG Technical Meetings (these were not voted on in the end - considerable additional work was required)
  • February submission:

Proof of Concept Demonstration

Here are the latest slides on the Derivatives Proof of Concept activities.

Workstreams

There are three initial streams of work associated with the development of the standard

The other activities that need to be managed

Formal project plans and clear definition of deliverables will be developed for each approved stream of work.

Meeting Presentations and Notes

Major Events

Contact Information

 
start.txt · Last modified: 2013/06/18 06:59 by mikehypercube
 
OMG Home Logos and Trademarks Become a Member Become a Sponsor Upcoming TC Meeting TOP